Syriopoulos K, Velders X L, Sanderink G C, van Ginkel F C, van der Stelt P F
Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 Mar;28(2):80-8. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600416.
To examine the effects of exhaustion of five different processing solutions on the sensitometric properties of four dental X-ray films: Ektaspeed Plus and Ultra-speed (Kodak Eastman Co. Rochester, USA) and new and previous Dentus M2 (Agfa-Gevaert, Mortsel, Belgium).
An aluminum stepwedge was used to construct characteristic curves for the four films. All films were processed manually using three sets of chemicals for manual processing: Agfa (Heraeus Kulzer, Dormagen, Germany), Kodak (Kodak-Pathé, Paris, France) and Demat (Viscopac, Athens, Greece) and two sets for automatic processing: Dürr XR and Periomat (Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany). Film speed and gradient were evaluated until the chemicals were completely exhausted. An analysis of variance was performed separately for each set of chemicals for manual and automatic processing.
Ektaspeed Plus was the fastest film in the manual processing solutions. The new Dentus M2 and Ektaspeed Plus films had similar speed using the chemicals for automatic processing. Ultra-speed had the lowest speed in all solutions, but it had the greatest consistency. Exhaustion of the developer caused a comparable decrease in speed of Ektaspeed Plus and the two Dentus M2 films. In fresh chemistry Agfa was the strongest manual processing solution, but it had the highest exhaustion rate. The Dürr XR chemical was stronger than Periomat over the whole test period.
The combination of film and processing solution is an important factor for achieving constant sensitometric properties. Ektaspeed Plus and the new Dentus M2 film should be used in dental practice, as they require lower exposure and have equivalent or superior properties compared with Ultra-speed.
研究五种不同冲洗液耗尽时对四种牙科X线胶片感光特性的影响,这四种胶片分别为:Ektaspeed Plus和Ultra-speed(美国柯达伊士曼公司,罗切斯特)以及新型和旧型Dentus M2(比利时爱克发 - 吉华集团,莫特塞尔)。
使用铝制阶梯楔形块构建四种胶片的特性曲线。所有胶片均采用三组手动冲洗化学剂进行手动冲洗:爱克发(德国贺利氏古莎公司,多马根)、柯达(法国柯达 - 百代公司,巴黎)和德马特(希腊雅典Viscopac公司),以及两组自动冲洗化学剂:迪尔XR和Periomat(德国迪尔牙科公司,比蒂希海姆 - 比辛根)。在化学剂完全耗尽之前,对胶片速度和对比度进行评估。分别对每组手动和自动冲洗化学剂进行方差分析。
在手动冲洗液中,Ektaspeed Plus是速度最快的胶片。使用自动冲洗化学剂时,新型Dentus M2和Ektaspeed Plus胶片速度相似。Ultra-speed在所有冲洗液中速度最低,但一致性最好。显影剂耗尽导致Ektaspeed Plus和两种Dentus M2胶片的速度出现类似程度的下降。在新鲜化学剂中,爱克发是最强的手动冲洗液,但耗尽率最高。在整个测试期间,迪尔XR化学剂比Periomat更强。
胶片和冲洗液的组合是实现恒定感光特性的重要因素。Ektaspeed Plus和新型Dentus M2胶片应在牙科实践中使用,因为它们所需的曝光量较低,并且与Ultra-speed相比具有同等或更优的性能。