• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死:经皮支架血管重建术后心脏磁共振成像的安全性

Acute myocardial infarction: safety of cardiac MR imaging after percutaneous revascularization with stents.

作者信息

Patel Manesh R, Albert Timothy S E, Kandzari David E, Honeycutt Emily F, Shaw Linda K, Sketch Michael H, Elliott Michael D, Judd Robert M, Kim Raymond J

机构信息

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center and Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):674-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2403050740.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.2403050740
PMID:16926324
Abstract

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine the safety of cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed early (<14 days) after coronary stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPPA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board; the informed consent requirement was waived. Consecutive patients with AMI who underwent cardiac MR imaging (study group) shortly after stent implantation (median, 3 days) were compared with control subjects who did not undergo MR imaging and were matched for clinical factors and angiographic extent of coronary disease. A 1.5-T MR imager was used to evaluate cine function, perfusion, and viability. Rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or revascularization 30 days and 6 months after stent implantation were compared with chi(2) analysis.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 66 patients (median age, 56 years; 17 women) with 97 stents, 38 (39%) of which were drug eluting. The control group included 124 patients (median age, 58 years; 23% women) with 197 stents, 21 (10.7%) of which were drug eluting. There was no significant (P = .13) difference in the combined end point of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or revascularization between the study (2.0% [95% confidence interval: 0.0%, 4.5%]) and control (6.5% [95% confidence interval: 1.6%, 11.3%]) groups at 30-day follow-up. The event-free survival rate at 6-month follow-up was 91% in the study group and 83.7% in the control group (P = .18). Considering the end points separately, there was no difference in the event rate at 30-day or 6-month follow-up between groups. No adverse cardiovascular events occurred in patients with drug-eluting stents who underwent MR imaging.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac MR imaging performed shortly after AMI and percutaneous revascularization with bare metal or drug-eluting stents appears safe. The risk of adverse cardiovascular events is low and similar to that in patients who do not undergo MR imaging.

摘要

目的

回顾性确定急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者冠状动脉支架植入术后早期(<14天)进行心脏磁共振(MR)成像的安全性。

材料与方法

本符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPPA)的研究经机构审查委员会批准;豁免了知情同意要求。将支架植入后不久(中位时间为3天)接受心脏MR成像的连续AMI患者(研究组)与未接受MR成像且在临床因素和冠状动脉疾病血管造影范围方面相匹配的对照组进行比较。使用1.5-T MR成像仪评估电影功能、灌注和存活情况。通过卡方分析比较支架植入后30天和6个月时的死亡、非致命性心肌梗死或血运重建率。

结果

研究组由66例患者(中位年龄56岁;17例女性)组成,共植入97枚支架,其中38枚(39%)为药物洗脱支架。对照组包括124例患者(中位年龄58岁;23%为女性),共植入197枚支架,其中21枚(10.7%)为药物洗脱支架。在30天随访时,研究组(2.0%[95%置信区间:0.0%,4.5%])和对照组(6.5%[95%置信区间:1.6%,11.3%])在死亡、非致命性心肌梗死或血运重建的联合终点方面无显著差异(P = 0.13)。在6个月随访时,研究组的无事件生存率为91%,对照组为83.7%(P = 0.18)。分别考虑各个终点,两组在30天或6个月随访时的事件发生率无差异。接受MR成像的药物洗脱支架患者未发生不良心血管事件。

结论

AMI后不久以及使用裸金属或药物洗脱支架进行经皮血运重建后进行心脏MR成像似乎是安全的。不良心血管事件的风险较低,与未接受MR成像的患者相似。

相似文献

1
Acute myocardial infarction: safety of cardiac MR imaging after percutaneous revascularization with stents.急性心肌梗死:经皮支架血管重建术后心脏磁共振成像的安全性
Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):674-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2403050740.
2
Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死中紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1946-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810116.
3
Outcomes after unrestricted use of everolimus-eluting stent compared to paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents.不限定使用依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇和西罗莫司洗脱支架的临床结果比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jun 15;107(12):1757-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.330. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
4
Paclitaxel-eluting versus bare-metal stents in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)中紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2008 Dec;7(4):232-8. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181805e0b.
5
Long-term safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting stents compared to bare metal stents following successful PCI in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Guthrie Health Off-Label StenT (GHOST) Registry.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)成功后的长期安全性和有效性比较:来自格思里卫生超适应证支架(GHOST)登记研究的结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Feb;25(1):28-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00677.x. Epub 2011 Oct 9.
6
Three-year follow-up after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with first-generation or second-generation drug-eluting stents.第一代或第二代药物洗脱支架治疗裸金属支架再狭窄后的三年随访。
Coron Artery Dis. 2013 Mar;24(2):165-70. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32835c8fb2.
7
Long-term effects of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents on patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: outcomes of 3-year clinical follow-up.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期影响:3 年临床随访结果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Aug;125(16):2803-6.
8
Impact of "off-label" utilization of drug-eluting stents on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.药物洗脱支架“非标签”使用对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Feb 1;101(3):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.08.048. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
9
Long-term clinical effects of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary artery stent implantation.磁共振成像对冠状动脉支架植入患者的长期临床影响
Coron Artery Dis. 2009 Mar;20(2):138-42. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328322cd48.
10
Sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization.用于冠状动脉血运重建的西罗莫司洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 18;353(7):653-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051175. Epub 2005 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging safety following percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的心脏磁共振成像安全性。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;29(7):1485-90. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0231-9. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
2
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010年心血管磁共振专家共识文件:美国心脏病学会基金会专家共识文件特别工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 8;55(23):2614-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.011.
3
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010年心血管磁共振专家共识文件:美国心脏病学会基金会专家共识文件特别工作组报告
Circulation. 2010 Jun 8;121(22):2462-508. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d44a8f. Epub 2010 May 17.
4
Clinical safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T early after stent placement for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后支架置入早期行 3T 心脏磁共振成像的临床安全性。
Eur Radiol. 2009 Dec;19(12):2913-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1498-z.
5
Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the hyperacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死超急性期的对比增强心血管磁共振成像
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jun;25(5):519-27. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9451-4. Epub 2009 Mar 15.
6
Diagnostic value of late gadolinium-enhanced MRI and first-pass dynamic MRI for predicting functional recovery in patients after acute myocardial infarction.延迟钆增强磁共振成像和首过动态磁共振成像对预测急性心肌梗死后患者功能恢复的诊断价值。
Radiat Med. 2007 Jul;25(6):263-71. doi: 10.1007/s11604-007-0133-7. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
7
MRI in patients with cardiac devices.心脏植入设备患者的磁共振成像
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007 Mar;9(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s11886-007-0012-y.