• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速临床研究方案:一项随机对照试验,旨在评估在线证据检索系统对全科医疗决策的影响。

Protocol for the Quick Clinical study: a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of an online evidence retrieval system on decision-making in general practice.

作者信息

Coiera Enrico, Magrabi Farah, Westbrook Johanna I, Kidd Michael R, Day Richard O

机构信息

Centre for Health Informatics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Aug 24;6:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-33.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-6-33
PMID:16928282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1564384/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online information retrieval systems have the potential to improve patient care but there are few comparative studies of the impact of online evidence on clinicians' decision-making behaviour in routine clinical work.

METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized controlled parallel design is employed to assess the effectiveness of an online evidence retrieval system, Quick Clinical (QC) in improving clinical decision-making processes in general practice. Eligible clinicians are randomised either to receive access or not to receive access to QC in their consulting rooms for 12 months. Participants complete pre- and post trial surveys.Two-hundred general practitioners are recruited. Participants must be registered to practice in Australia, have a computer with Internet access in their consulting room and use electronic prescribing. Clinicians planning to retire or move to another practice within 12 months or participating in any other clinical trial involving electronic extraction of prescriptions data are excluded from the study. The primary end-points for the study is clinician acceptance and use of QC and the resulting change in decision-making behaviour. The study will examine prescribing patterns related to frequently prescribed medications where there has been a recent significant shift in recommendations regarding their use based upon new evidence. Secondary outcome measures include self-reported changes in diagnosis, patient education, prescriptions written, investigations and referrals.

DISCUSSION

A trial under experimental conditions is an effective way of examining the impact of using QC in routine general practice consultations.

摘要

背景

在线信息检索系统有改善患者护理的潜力,但在日常临床工作中,关于在线证据对临床医生决策行为影响的比较研究很少。

方法/设计:采用随机对照平行设计,评估在线证据检索系统“快速临床”(QC)在改善全科医疗临床决策过程中的有效性。符合条件的临床医生被随机分为两组,一组在其诊疗室可使用QC,另一组在12个月内无法使用。参与者需完成试验前和试验后的调查。招募200名全科医生。参与者必须在澳大利亚注册执业,诊疗室有可上网的电脑且使用电子处方。计划在12个月内退休或转至其他医疗机构执业,或参与任何其他涉及电子提取处方数据的临床试验的临床医生被排除在研究之外。该研究的主要终点是临床医生对QC的接受和使用情况以及决策行为由此产生的变化。该研究将检查与常用药物相关的处方模式,这些药物基于新证据,其使用建议近期发生了重大变化。次要结局指标包括自我报告的诊断、患者教育、所开处方、检查和转诊方面的变化。

讨论

在实验条件下进行试验是检验在常规全科医疗咨询中使用QC的影响的有效方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfdf/1564384/485388ec7f2f/1472-6947-6-33-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfdf/1564384/5b38eb6dc8e5/1472-6947-6-33-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfdf/1564384/5d836eb90ed2/1472-6947-6-33-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfdf/1564384/485388ec7f2f/1472-6947-6-33-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfdf/1564384/5b38eb6dc8e5/1472-6947-6-33-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfdf/1564384/5d836eb90ed2/1472-6947-6-33-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfdf/1564384/485388ec7f2f/1472-6947-6-33-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol for the Quick Clinical study: a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of an online evidence retrieval system on decision-making in general practice.快速临床研究方案:一项随机对照试验,旨在评估在线证据检索系统对全科医疗决策的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Aug 24;6:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-33.
2
General practitioners' use of online evidence during consultations.全科医生在会诊期间对在线证据的使用。
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Jan;74(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.10.003.
3
What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings?哪些因素与将循证检索技术整合到常规全科医疗环境中有关?
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Oct;76(10):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.009. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
4
Factors affecting feasibility and acceptability of a practice-based educational intervention to support evidence-based prescribing: a qualitative study.影响基于实践的教育干预以支持循证处方的可行性和可接受性的因素:一项定性研究
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):661-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh614. Epub 2004 Nov 4.
5
Online on-the-spot searching increases use of evidence during consultations in family practice.在家庭医疗会诊期间,在线即时检索可增加证据的使用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Sep;68(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 May 30.
6
The impact of an online evidence system on confidence in decision making in a controlled setting.在线证据系统对可控环境下决策信心的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):178-85. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05275155.
7
Clinicians' assessments of the usefulness of online evidence to answer clinical questions.临床医生对在线证据用于回答临床问题的有用性评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):297-300.
8
Critical incidents and journey mapping as techniques to evaluate the impact of online evidence retrieval systems on health care delivery and patient outcomes.将关键事件和旅程映射作为评估在线证据检索系统对医疗服务提供和患者结局影响的技术。
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Feb-Mar;76(2-3):234-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.03.006. Epub 2006 Jun 22.
9
Do clinical findings in lower respiratory tract infection help general practitioners prescribe antibiotics appropriately? An observational cohort study in general practice.下呼吸道感染的临床检查结果能否帮助全科医生合理开具抗生素?一项全科医疗中的观察性队列研究。
Fam Pract. 2006 Apr;23(2):180-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi100. Epub 2005 Dec 2.
10
[Controlled randomized clinical trials].[对照随机临床试验]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2007 Apr-May;191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to increase the use of electronic health information by healthcare practitioners to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes.旨在增加医疗从业者对电子健康信息的使用以改善临床实践和患者治疗效果的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 14;2015(3):CD004749. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004749.pub3.
2
How online crowds influence the way individual consumers answer health questions: an online prospective study.在线众包如何影响个体消费者回答健康问题的方式:一项在线前瞻性研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Jun 1;2(2):177-89. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0006. Print 2011.
3
Electronic retrieval of health information by healthcare providers to improve practice and patient care.

本文引用的文献

1
Architecture for knowledge-based and federated search of online clinical evidence.基于知识和联合搜索在线临床证据的架构。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Oct 24;7(5):e52. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.5.e52.
2
Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: a literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies.临床信息检索技术对医生的影响:定量、定性及混合方法研究的文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Sep;74(9):745-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.05.004.
3
General practitioners' use of online evidence during consultations.
医疗保健提供者通过电子方式检索健康信息以改善医疗实践和患者护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD004749. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004749.pub2.
全科医生在会诊期间对在线证据的使用。
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Jan;74(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.10.003.
4
Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions.回答医生的临床问题:障碍与潜在解决方案。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):217-24. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1608. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
5
How information retrieval technology may impact on physician practice: an organizational case study in family medicine.信息检索技术如何影响医生的实践:家庭医学中的一项组织案例研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 Aug;10(3):413-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00498.x.
6
Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验的样本量计算器。
Comput Biol Med. 2004 Mar;34(2):113-25. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00039-8.
7
Randomised controlled trial of clinical decision support tools to improve learning of evidence based medicine in medical students.用于提高医学生循证医学学习效果的临床决策支持工具的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 8;327(7423):1090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1090.
8
Validating an instrument for selecting interventions to change physician practice patterns: a Michigan Consortium for Family Practice Research study.验证一种用于选择干预措施以改变医生执业模式的工具:密歇根家庭医学研究联盟的一项研究。
J Fam Pract. 2002 Nov;51(11):938-42.
9
Primary care guidelines on consultation practices: the effectiveness of computerized versus paper-based versions. A cluster randomized controlled trial among newly qualified primary care physicians.初级保健咨询实践指南:电子版与纸质版的有效性。一项针对新获得资格的初级保健医生的整群随机对照试验。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Summer;18(3):586-96.
10
Reinventing ourselves.重塑自我。
Med J Aust. 2000 Oct 2;173(7):343-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb125682.x.