物质使用与抑郁症及其他精神障碍的共病:从《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)到第五版(DSM-V)
Comorbidity of substance use with depression and other mental disorders: from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) to DSM-V.
作者信息
Nunes Edward V, Rounsaville Bruce J
机构信息
New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA.
出版信息
Addiction. 2006 Sep;101 Suppl 1:89-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01585.x.
AIMS
To arrive at recommendations for addressing co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders in the development of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fifth edition (DSM-V) criteria.
METHODS
Synthesis of findings of other papers from a consensus conference and from the literature on diagnosis and treatment of co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders. Most of the relevant studies examine co-occurring depression.
RESULTS
The diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric syndromes that co-occur with substance use disorders has been a source of controversy, fueled in part by limitations of pre-DSM-IV nosologies. The DSM-IV scheme of classifying co-occurring disorders as primary (also referred to as independent) or substance-induced has promise in terms of good predictive validity, although pertinent longitudinal and treatment studies are limited. The substance-induced category answers the need of clinicians for a way to categorize patients with clinically significant psychiatric symptoms that occur in the setting of ongoing substance use.
CONCLUSIONS
DSM-V should retain the primary (independent) and substance-induced categories. In DSM-IV these categories are broadly defined and leave much to clinical judgement. Existing data sets should be brought to bear to refine the criteria, making them more detailed with clearer anchor points and more specificity around particular substances and psychiatric syndromes. More longitudinal studies and clinical trials are also needed. Looking beyond DSM-V, co-occurring psychiatric syndromes are likely to be important in the quest for a nosology founded on pathophysiology.
目标
为在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-V)标准制定过程中解决共病的精神障碍和物质使用障碍问题提供建议。
方法
综合来自共识会议的其他论文以及关于共病的精神障碍和物质使用障碍诊断与治疗的文献中的研究结果。大多数相关研究考察的是共病的抑郁症。
结果
与物质使用障碍共病的精神综合征的诊断和治疗一直存在争议,部分原因是DSM-IV之前的疾病分类法存在局限性。DSM-IV将共病障碍分类为原发性(也称为独立性)或物质所致性的方案在预测效度方面具有前景,尽管相关的纵向研究和治疗研究有限。物质所致性类别满足了临床医生对一种方法的需求,即对在持续物质使用情况下出现具有临床显著意义的精神症状的患者进行分类。
结论
DSM-V应保留原发性(独立性)和物质所致性类别。在DSM-IV中,这些类别定义宽泛,很大程度上依赖临床判断。应利用现有数据集来完善标准,使其更详细,具有更清晰的锚定点,并且在特定物质和精神综合征方面更具特异性。还需要更多的纵向研究和临床试验。超越DSM-V来看,共病的精神综合征在寻求基于病理生理学的疾病分类法方面可能很重要。