Hansson Elisabeth, Fridlund Bengt, Hallström Inger
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Pain Manag Nurs. 2006 Sep;7(3):93-108. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2006.06.002.
Hospitalized patients have a right to be assessed for pain and receive optimal pain management, but inadequate pain management is still widely prevalent. Different quality improvement (QI) approaches have been used to improve patients' experience of pain, with varied results. The aim of this study was to implement a QI program and evaluate its effects on pain management routines in acute care, experienced by patients, nurses, and physicians. A cross-sectional intervention study was conducted with patients, nurses, and physicians assigned to a control group for 2 months in 2002 and an intervention group for 2 months in 2003. Implementation of a QI program, including pain policy and an educational program for the health care professionals, was evaluated with questionnaires. Nurses' assessment of pain at rest and pain with movement with pain rating scales increased (p < .001) after the intervention. Nurses participating in the educational program increased their knowledge of pain and changed their pain management routines and search habits for pain-related websites on the Internet. The number of patients assessed with pain rating scales increased (p = .011), but no difference was seen in patients' experience of pain severity, interference with function, or use of nonpharmacologic methods. Younger and higher-educated patients seemed to prefer a more active participation role in their pain management than did older and low-educated patients. In future research it would be valuable to illuminate patients' possibilities to participate in pain management further and test different implementation methods with varied length of educational programs including follow-ups for the whole team and the patients in acute care.
住院患者有权接受疼痛评估并获得最佳疼痛管理,但疼痛管理不足的情况仍然广泛存在。不同的质量改进(QI)方法已被用于改善患者的疼痛体验,结果各异。本研究的目的是实施一项QI计划,并评估其对急性护理中患者、护士和医生所经历的疼痛管理常规的影响。2002年,对患者、护士和医生进行了一项横断面干预研究,将其分为对照组,为期2个月;2003年,将另一组作为干预组,为期2个月。通过问卷调查对包括疼痛政策和针对医护人员的教育计划在内的QI计划的实施情况进行了评估。干预后,护士使用疼痛评定量表对静息时疼痛和活动时疼痛的评估有所增加(p < .001)。参加教育计划的护士增加了对疼痛的了解,改变了他们的疼痛管理常规以及在互联网上搜索疼痛相关网站的习惯。使用疼痛评定量表进行评估的患者数量有所增加(p = .011),但在患者的疼痛严重程度体验、功能干扰或非药物方法的使用方面未发现差异。与年龄较大和受教育程度较低的患者相比,年龄较小和受教育程度较高的患者似乎更倾向于在疼痛管理中发挥更积极的参与作用。在未来的研究中,进一步阐明患者参与疼痛管理的可能性,并测试不同的实施方法,包括针对整个团队和急性护理患者的不同长度教育计划及后续跟进,将是很有价值的。