Suppr超能文献

危重症患者的临终关怀:一项全国重症监护病房调查。

End-of-life care for the critically ill: A national intensive care unit survey.

作者信息

Nelson Judith E, Angus Derek C, Weissfeld Lisa A, Puntillo Kathleen A, Danis Marion, Deal David, Levy Mitchell M, Cook Deborah J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hertzberg Palliative Care Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):2547-53. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239233.63425.1D.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

One in five Americans dies following treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), and evidence indicates the need to improve end-of-life care for ICU patients. We conducted this study to elicit the views and experiences of ICU directors regarding barriers to optimal end-of-life care and to identify the type, availability, and perceived benefit of specific strategies that may improve this care.

DESIGN

Self-administered mail survey.

SETTING

Six hundred intensive care units.

PARTICIPANTS

A random, nationally representative sample of nursing and physician directors of 600 adult ICUs in the United States.

INTERVENTIONS

Mail survey.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We asked participants about barriers to end-of-life care (1 = huge to 5 = not at all a barrier), perceived benefit of strategies to improve end-of-life care, and availability of these strategies. From 468 ICUs (78.0% of sample), 590 ICU directors participated (406 nurses [65.1% response] and 184 physicians [31.7% response]). Respondents had a mean of 16.6 yrs (sd 7.6 yrs) of ICU experience. Important barriers to better end-of-life care included patient/family factors, including unrealistic patient/family expectations 2.5 (1.0), inability of patients to participate in discussions 2.7 (0.9), and lack of advance directives 2.9 (1.0); clinician factors, which included insufficient physician training in communication 2.9 (1.1) and competing demands on physicians' time 3.0 (1.1); and institution/ICU factors, such as suboptimal space for family meetings 3.5 (1.2) and lack of a palliative care service 3.4 (1.2). More than 80% of respondents rated 14 of 14 strategies as likely to improve end-of-life care, including trainee role modeling by experienced clinicians, clinician training in communication and symptom management, regular meetings of senior clinicians with families, bereavement programs, and end-of-life care quality monitoring. However, few of these strategies were widely available.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive care unit directors perceive important barriers to optimal end-of-life care but also universally endorse many practical strategies for quality improvement.

摘要

目的

五分之一的美国人在重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗后死亡,有证据表明需要改善ICU患者的临终关怀。我们开展这项研究以了解ICU主任对于最佳临终关怀障碍的看法和经历,并确定可能改善这种关怀的具体策略的类型、可用性及感知到的益处。

设计

自行填写的邮寄调查问卷。

地点

600个重症监护病房。

参与者

美国600个成人ICU的护理和医生主任的随机、具有全国代表性的样本。

干预措施

邮寄调查问卷。

测量指标及主要结果

我们询问参与者关于临终关怀的障碍(1 = 极大障碍至5 = 完全不是障碍)、改善临终关怀策略的感知益处以及这些策略的可用性。来自468个ICU(占样本的78.0%),590名ICU主任参与调查(406名护士 [回复率65.1%] 和184名医生 [回复率31.7%])。受访者的ICU工作经验平均为16.6年(标准差7.6年)。更好的临终关怀的重要障碍包括患者/家属因素,如患者/家属不切实际的期望2.5(1.0)、患者无法参与讨论2.7(0.9)以及缺乏预先指示2.9(1.0);临床医生因素,包括医生在沟通方面培训不足2.9(1.1)以及医生时间被其他事务占用3.0(1.1);机构/ICU因素,如家属会议空间不理想3.5(1.2)以及缺乏姑息治疗服务3.4(1.2)。超过80%的受访者认为14种策略中的14种可能改善临终关怀,包括经验丰富的临床医生对实习生的示范作用、临床医生在沟通和症状管理方面的培训、资深临床医生与家属的定期会议、哀伤辅导项目以及临终关怀质量监测。然而,这些策略中很少有广泛可用的。

结论

重症监护病房主任认识到最佳临终关怀存在重要障碍,但也普遍认可许多提高质量的实用策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验