Kahn Jeremy M, Matthews Francesca A, Angus Derek C, Barnato Amber E, Rubenfeld Gordon D
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98119, USA.
J Crit Care. 2007 Jun;22(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.09.003. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
The Leapfrog Group, representing a consortium of health care purchasers, has promoted standards for intensive care unit (ICU) staffing in nonrural areas. The purpose of this study was to examine the perception of the Leapfrog standards among ICU directors and determine the potential barriers to implementing these standards.
We performed a telephone survey of physician ICU directors using a stratified random sample of hospitals in the Committee on Manpower for Pulmonary Critical Care Societies database.
Seventy-two ICUs in 72 hospitals were surveyed. Forty-seven ICUs responded to telephone inquires. Of these, 21 (45%) could identify an ICU director, 20 of which answered questions about their own hospital's compliance. Only 5 ICU directors (25%) cited current compliance with the Leapfrog standard for intensivist staffing. Of the 15 directors not in compliance, 13 were motivated to adopt the recommendations in the future. Loss of control, loss of income, and increased cost to hospital administration were cited as important barriers to implementing the recommendations. Increased availability of intensivists, increased funds from hospital administrators, and assistance from government and third parties were viewed as important potential solutions to these barriers.
Numerous barriers exist to implementing the Leapfrog recommendations for intensivist staffing, not the least of which is the lack of an ICU director in many hospitals. Better strategies are needed to overcome these barriers before the widespread adoption of an intensivist care model similar to Leapfrog is feasible.
代表医疗保健购买者联盟的“跳蛙组织”推动了非农村地区重症监护病房(ICU)人员配备标准的制定。本研究的目的是调查ICU主任对“跳蛙标准”的看法,并确定实施这些标准的潜在障碍。
我们使用肺重症监护学会人力委员会数据库中按分层随机抽样的医院,对ICU医生主任进行了电话调查。
对72家医院的72个ICU进行了调查。47个ICU回复了电话询问。其中,21个(45%)能确定一位ICU主任,其中20位回答了关于他们自己医院合规情况的问题。只有5位ICU主任(25%)表示目前符合“跳蛙组织”关于重症监护医生人员配备的标准。在15位不符合标准的主任中,有13位表示未来有动力采纳这些建议。控制权丧失、收入损失以及医院管理成本增加被认为是实施这些建议的重要障碍。增加重症监护医生的可获得性、医院管理人员增加资金以及政府和第三方提供援助被视为克服这些障碍的重要潜在解决方案。
实施“跳蛙组织”关于重症监护医生人员配备的建议存在诸多障碍,其中不少障碍是许多医院缺乏ICU主任。在广泛采用类似于“跳蛙组织”的重症监护模式可行之前,需要更好的策略来克服这些障碍。