Juni Samuel, Gross Julie, Sokolowska Joanna
Department of Applied Psychology, New York University, 400 East Building, New York, NY 10003-6674, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2006 Jun;98(3):627-39. doi: 10.2466/pr0.98.3.627-639.
This study examined relationships between academic cheating behaviors by using self-reports of past cheating behavior, providing a situational experiment with the opportunity to cheat, and evaluating defense mechanisms and object relations as measured by the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Subjects included 75 female and 8 male university students ranging in age from 18 to 51 years (M=25.5, SD=6.9). Analysis showed variations in students' self-reported cheating history relative to their measured object relations status and type of defense mechanisms. Actual cheating in the experimental setting was not significantly related to any of these variables. Findings are discussed based on a critique of heterogeneity of the cheating construct.
本研究通过使用过去作弊行为的自我报告、提供作弊机会的情境实验以及评估防御机制量表所测量的防御机制和客体关系,来考察学术作弊行为之间的关系。研究对象包括75名女性和8名男性大学生,年龄在18至51岁之间(M = 25.5,SD = 6.9)。分析表明,学生自我报告的作弊历史与其测量的客体关系状态和防御机制类型存在差异。实验环境中的实际作弊行为与这些变量均无显著关联。基于对作弊结构异质性的批判对研究结果进行了讨论。