Department of Pediatric Dentistry, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, KSR Kalvi Nagar, Thokkavadi, Thiruchengode, Tamil Nadu 637215, India;
J Dent Educ. 2013 Oct;77(10):1379-83.
Cheating behavior has been a serious problem in dental institutions across the globe. Attitudes of dental students have an impact on the quality of health care provided to their patients. This descriptive cross-sectional study had the following objectives: to assess and compare the attitudes of dental students and teachers about cheating behaviors, to assess students' opinions of various justifications for their cheating, and to assess teachers' attitudes towards various punishment options for cheating behaviors. The study sample consisted of 1,261 undergraduate students and 131 teachers from six randomly chosen dental colleges in Tamil Nadu State, India. A closed-ended questionnaire was used for respondents to rate the seriousness of cheating behaviors. The students were asked to justify their cheating behavior, and the teachers were asked to assign punishments for the cheating behaviors. The attitudes of students and teachers on the cheating behaviors were analyzed and compared using a Pearson chisquare test, with a confidence interval of 95 percent and significance level of p≤0.05. The attitudes of the teachers and students were statistically different in two cheating behaviors: copying during exams and helping other students copy in exams. The two main justifying reasons students gave for cheating behavior were to pass the exam (59.3 percent) and to obtain a better grade (31.3 percent). Warning and counseling to help the students reassess their moral values were preferred to penalizing punishments by the teachers.
在全球范围内,欺骗行为一直是牙科机构的一个严重问题。牙科学生的态度对他们向患者提供的医疗保健质量有影响。本描述性横断面研究有以下目的:评估和比较牙科学生和教师对欺骗行为的态度,评估学生对各种欺骗理由的看法,以及评估教师对各种欺骗行为惩罚选择的态度。研究样本包括来自印度泰米尔纳德邦六所随机选择的牙科学院的 1261 名本科生和 131 名教师。使用封闭式问卷让受访者对欺骗行为的严重程度进行评分。要求学生为自己的欺骗行为辩护,要求教师为欺骗行为分配惩罚。使用 Pearson chi-square 检验分析和比较学生和教师对欺骗行为的态度,置信区间为 95%,显著性水平为 p≤0.05。教师和学生在两种欺骗行为上的态度存在统计学差异:考试时抄袭和帮助其他学生在考试中抄袭。学生为欺骗行为提供的两个主要理由是通过考试(59.3%)和获得更好的成绩(31.3%)。教师更倾向于警告和咨询以帮助学生重新评估他们的价值观,而不是惩罚性惩罚。