Armstrong Melissa J, Schneck Michael J, Biller José
Department of Neurology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA.
Neurol Clin. 2006 Nov;24(4):607-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2006.06.003.
Growing evidence suggests that perioperative withdrawal of ASA for secondary stroke prevention increases thromboembolic risk without the associated benefit of decreased bleeding complications. ASA maintenance is acceptable in many procedures, including invasive ones. Many procedures, in particular ophthalmologic, dermatologic, and dental surgeries, also are safe while continuing oral AC. Warfarin has been continued successfully even in some surgeries that have high bleeding risk. When the risk is too high, temporary bridging therapy with LWMH is safe in many populations. Although the exact thromboembolic risks associated with temporary cessation of AP and AC are unknown and likely low, morbidity and mortality associated with thromboembolism are high. Further studies investigating the risks and benefits of maintaining AP and AC during procedures, particularly invasive ones, are needed. Meanwhile, it is critical that physicians understand the risks and benefits of perioperative AP and AC and the variety of procedures in which these agents can be safely continued.
越来越多的证据表明,围手术期停用阿司匹林进行二级卒中预防会增加血栓栓塞风险,且不会带来出血并发症减少的相关益处。在许多手术中,包括侵入性手术,维持使用阿司匹林是可以接受的。许多手术,特别是眼科、皮肤科和牙科手术,在继续口服抗凝药的情况下也是安全的。即使在一些出血风险高的手术中,华法林也已成功持续使用。当风险过高时,在许多人群中使用低分子量肝素进行临时桥接治疗是安全的。尽管与暂时停用抗血小板药物和抗凝药相关的确切血栓栓塞风险尚不清楚且可能较低,但血栓栓塞相关的发病率和死亡率却很高。需要进一步研究在手术过程中,特别是侵入性手术中维持抗血小板药物和抗凝药的风险和益处。与此同时,至关重要的是医生要了解围手术期抗血小板药物和抗凝药的风险和益处,以及这些药物可以安全持续使用的各种手术。