Rosenfeld Philip J, Rich Ryan M, Lalwani Geeta A
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 900 NW 17th Street, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2006 Sep;19(3):361-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ohc.2006.05.009.
Ranibizumab therapy is the first treatment for neovascular AMD to improve vision for most patients. The benefits apply to all angiographic subtypes of neovascular AMD and across all lesion sizes. Although the pivotal phase III trials (MARINA and ANCHOR) used monthly injections of ranibizumab for 2 years, the ongoing PIER, PrONTO, and SAILOR trials are investigating less frequent dosing regimens, and preliminary results from the PrONTO study suggest that fewer injections will most likely result in visual acuity improvements similar to the results from the phase III trials. When comparing the ANCHOR results with the FOCUS results, it also becomes apparent that the combination of ranibizumab with PDT does not necessarily result in better visual acuity outcomes, and the use of PDT may even reduce the visual acuity benefits achieved with ranibizumab alone (see Figs. 1-3). It seems unlikely that combination therapy provides any significant advantage over ranibizumab alone unless the combination of PDT and ranibizumab can decrease the need for frequent retreatment. The results from the PrONTO Study already suggest that less frequent treatment with ranibizumab is possible by using a variable dosing regimen with OCT. Ranibizumab also seems to be safe, with the 2-year MARINA data showing no increase in the incidence of systemic adverse events that could be associated with anti-VEGF therapy, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. There was a hint of a safety concern, however, in the pooled 1-year safety results from the MARINA and ANCHOR trials. Although the combined rate of myocardial infarction and stroke during the first year of the ANCHOR and MARINA trials was similar in the control and the 0.3-mg ranibizumab arms (1.3% and 1.6% respectively), these adverse events were slightly higher in the 0.5-mg ranibizumab arm (2.9%). These differences are not statistically significant, however, and probably do not represent a dose-dependent increase in risk because the 2-year results from the MARINA trial with the same monthly injection regimen showed no increased risk of thromboembolic events. In December 2005, Genentech submitted a Biologics License Application to the FDA for the use of ranibizumab in the treatment of neovascular wet AMD based on 1-year clinical efficacy and safety data from the two pivotal phase III trials, ANCHOR and MARINA, and the phase I-II FOCUS trial. Genentech has been granted a 6-month Priority Review from the FDA with a decision anticipated 6 months from the December submission date or by the end of June 2006 [29]. By the summer of 2006, this revolutionary therapy should be available for the treatment of neovascular AMD. At that time, the major dilemma facing most retina specialists will be whether to use intravitreal ranibizumab or intravitreal bevacizumab, the low cost alternative, for the treatment of neovascular AMD.
雷珠单抗疗法是大多数患者改善视力的首个用于治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的疗法。其益处适用于新生血管性AMD的所有血管造影亚型以及所有病变大小。尽管关键的III期试验(MARINA和ANCHOR)使用每月注射雷珠单抗的方案持续2年,但正在进行的PIER、PrONTO和SAILOR试验正在研究给药频率较低的方案,PrONTO研究的初步结果表明,注射次数减少很可能会带来与III期试验结果相似的视力改善。在比较ANCHOR试验结果与FOCUS试验结果时,还可以明显看出,雷珠单抗与光动力疗法(PDT)联合使用不一定能带来更好的视力结果,而且使用PDT甚至可能降低单独使用雷珠单抗所获得的视力益处(见图1 - 3)。联合疗法似乎不太可能比单独使用雷珠单抗具有任何显著优势,除非PDT与雷珠单抗联合使用能够减少频繁再次治疗的需求。PrONTO研究的结果已经表明,通过使用基于光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的可变给药方案,可以减少雷珠单抗的治疗频率。雷珠单抗似乎也很安全,MARINA试验的2年数据显示,与抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗相关的全身性不良事件发生率没有增加,如心肌梗死和中风。然而,在MARINA和ANCHOR试验汇总的1年安全性结果中存在一个安全问题的迹象。尽管在ANCHOR和MARINA试验的第一年,对照组和雷珠单抗0.3毫克剂量组中心肌梗死和中风的综合发生率相似(分别为1.3%和1.6%),但在雷珠单抗0.5毫克剂量组中这些不良事件略高(2.9%)。然而,这些差异没有统计学意义,而且可能并不代表风险的剂量依赖性增加,因为采用相同每月注射方案的MARINA试验的2年结果显示血栓栓塞事件风险没有增加。2005年12月,基因泰克公司基于两项关键III期试验ANCHOR和MARINA以及I - II期FOCUS试验的1年临床疗效和安全性数据,向美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)提交了关于雷珠单抗用于治疗新生血管性湿性AMD的生物制品许可申请。基因泰克公司已获得FDA为期6个月的优先审评,预计自12月提交日期起6个月内或2006年6月底做出决定[29]。到2006年夏天,这种革命性的疗法应该可以用于治疗新生血管性AMD。届时,大多数视网膜专家面临的主要困境将是在治疗新生血管性AMD时是使用玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗还是使用低成本替代药物玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗。