Lukacs Nicholas W, Moore Martin L, Rudd Brian D, Berlin Aaron A, Collins Robert D, Olson Sandra J, Ho Samuel B, Peebles R Stokes
Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0602, USA.
Am J Pathol. 2006 Sep;169(3):977-86. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051055.
In this study we performed comparisons of pulmonary responses between two different respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antigenic subgroup A strains, A2 and Line 19. Line 19 strain induced significant dose-responsive airway hyperreactivity (AHR) in BALB/c mice at days 6 and 9 after infection, whereas the A2 strain induced no AHR at any dose. Histological examination indicated that A2 induced no goblet cell hyper/metaplasia, whereas the Line 19 induced goblet cell expansion and significant increases in gob5 and MUC5AC mRNA and protein levels in vivo. When examining cytokine responses, A2 strain induced significant interleukin (IL)-10 expression, whereas Line 19 strain induced significant IL-13 expression. When IL-13-/- mice were infected with Line 19 RSV, the AHR responses were abrogated along with gob5 gene expression. There was little difference in viral titer throughout the infection between the line 19- and A2-infected mice. However, the A2 strain grew to significantly higher titers than the Line 19 strain in HEp-2 cells in vitro. Thus, RSV Line 19-induced airway dysfunction does not correlate with viral load in vivo. These data demonstrate that different RSV strains of the same antigenic subgroup can elicit differential immune responses that impact the phenotypic expression of RSV-induced illness.
在本研究中,我们对两种不同的呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)A抗原亚组毒株A2和19号线株的肺部反应进行了比较。19号线株在感染后第6天和第9天在BALB/c小鼠中诱导出显著的剂量反应性气道高反应性(AHR),而A2毒株在任何剂量下均未诱导出AHR。组织学检查表明,A2毒株未诱导杯状细胞增生/化生,而19号线株在体内诱导杯状细胞扩张以及gob5和MUC5AC mRNA及蛋白水平显著升高。在检测细胞因子反应时,A2毒株诱导出显著的白细胞介素(IL)-10表达,而19号线株诱导出显著的IL-13表达。当用19号线株RSV感染IL-13基因敲除小鼠时,AHR反应以及gob5基因表达均被消除。在整个感染过程中,19号线株感染小鼠和A2毒株感染小鼠的病毒滴度几乎没有差异。然而,在体外HEp-2细胞中,A2毒株的生长滴度显著高于19号线株。因此,RSV 19号线株诱导的气道功能障碍与体内病毒载量无关。这些数据表明,同一抗原亚组的不同RSV毒株可引发不同的免疫反应,这些反应会影响RSV诱导疾病的表型表达。