Truy Eric, Eshraghi Adrien A, Balkany Thomas J, Telishi Fred F, Van De Water Thomas R, Lavieille Jean-Pierre
Département d'ORL, de Chirurgie Maxillo-Cervico-Faciale et d'Audiophonologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
Otol Neurotol. 2006 Sep;27(6):887-95. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000227905.32236.9f.
Since its introduction, surgery for the placement of the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) device has been performed using a facial recess approach. Because of the size of the VSB device, this approach requires a large facial recess that can lead to complications, i.e., facial palsy and/or taste disturbance. The purpose of this study is to develop and compare transcanal surgical approaches for leading the VSB into the middle ear.
Cadaver temporal bones in a university temporal bone laboratory.
First, two experienced senior surgeons validated the three possible approaches in human temporal bone: 1) the classical facial recess approach; 2) a small mastoidectomy, elevation of a tympanomeatal flap, small atticotomy, 0.5-mm cutting of the bony external auditory canal (EAC) from the cortical plane on its approximately two-thirds to three-fourths and then a trough to pass the electrode array into the middle ear; and 3) similar to the second approach but with replacing the cutting of the bony EAC with a tunnel from the mastoid cavity to the EAC. Both the second and third approaches were transcanal. Next, five residents and six attending surgeons performed the three operations and evaluate these different approaches by using analog visual scales (VAS) for each procedure. They assess the following: 1) the ease of passing the electrode array and the Floating Mass Transducer (FMT) into the middle ear, 2) the ease for FMT clipping, and 3) their self-confidence using each approach. Time required for the three operations was measured. Measurements of landmarks were obtained on all temporal bones. Two patient cases illustrate the clinical application of this new surgical approach.
The two transcanal approaches were assessed to be easier, faster, and safer methods for VSB surgery than the classic facial recess approach.
VSB surgery has been performed using a facial recess approach with risk for facial nerve and taste disturbance. Transcanal approaches are good alternative for this surgery. Three major limitations are to be assessed in future patient studies: the pathologic findings of the EAC, the design of the FMT regarding the axis of the ossicular chain, the long-term evaluation of the skin of the external ear canal.
自引入以来,放置Vibrant Soundbridge(VSB)装置的手术一直采用面神经隐窝入路进行。由于VSB装置的尺寸,这种入路需要较大的面神经隐窝,这可能导致并发症,即面神经麻痹和/或味觉障碍。本研究的目的是开发并比较将VSB引入中耳的经耳道手术入路。
大学颞骨实验室的尸体颞骨。
首先,两位经验丰富的资深外科医生在人类颞骨中验证了三种可能的入路:1)经典的面神经隐窝入路;2)小型乳突切除术、鼓膜-外耳道瓣掀起、小型上鼓室切开术,从皮质平面在其大约三分之二至四分之三处对骨性外耳道(EAC)进行0.5毫米的切割,然后形成一个槽,将电极阵列传入中耳;3)与第二种入路相似,但用从乳突腔到EAC的隧道代替骨性EAC的切割。第二种和第三种入路均为经耳道入路。接下来,五名住院医师和六名主治医生进行这三种手术,并通过使用模拟视觉量表(VAS)对每个手术过程评估这些不同的入路。他们评估以下内容:1)将电极阵列和浮动质量传感器(FMT)传入中耳的难易程度,2)FMT夹闭的难易程度,3)他们对使用每种入路的自信程度。测量了三种手术所需的时间。在所有颞骨上获取了标志点的测量值。两个患者病例说明了这种新手术入路的临床应用。
与经典的面神经隐窝入路相比,两种经耳道入路被评估为VSB手术更简便、更快且更安全的方法。
VSB手术一直采用面神经隐窝入路进行,存在面神经和味觉障碍的风险。经耳道入路是这种手术的良好替代方法。未来的患者研究中需要评估三个主要局限性:EAC的病理结果、FMT关于听骨链轴线的设计、外耳道皮肤的长期评估。