Püspök Andreas
Klinische Abteilung für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin IV, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2006 Jul;156(13-14):386-90. doi: 10.1007/s10354-006-0313-6.
Modern cross sectional imaging methods like CT and MRCP have replaced more invasive methods for the diagnosis of cholangiolithiasis as well as benign and malignant biliary strictures. Only if a histologic or cytologic confirmation of the diagnosis is necessary, is a direct access to the biliary tract either with ERC or PTC justified as a diagnostic procedure. Due to technical advancements in laparoscopic surgery intraoperative bile duct revision has become a standard procedure for patients with choledocholithiasis discovered during cholecystectomy. It has been shown to be equally effective to ERC. In this setting ERC therefore has lost its unique claim for the treatment of bile duct stones, while it remains the treatment of choice in patients with prior cholecystectomy. In contrast ERC, sometimes in combination with PTC, has become the mainstay in the treatment of biliary lesions like leakage and benign strictures. The same is true for the palliation of malignant biliary strictures. Surgery should be reserved for patients in whom minimal invasive methods fail and for the curative treatment of malignant lesions.
现代横断面成像方法,如CT和磁共振胆胰管造影(MRCP),已取代了侵入性更强的方法来诊断胆管结石以及良性和恶性胆管狭窄。只有在需要组织学或细胞学确诊时,通过内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERC)或经皮肝穿刺胆管造影(PTC)直接进入胆道作为诊断程序才是合理的。由于腹腔镜手术技术的进步,术中胆管探查已成为胆囊切除术中发现胆总管结石患者的标准程序。它已被证明与ERC同样有效。因此,在这种情况下,ERC已失去其治疗胆管结石的独特优势,而对于已行胆囊切除术的患者,它仍是首选治疗方法。相比之下,ERC有时联合PTC,已成为治疗胆漏和良性狭窄等胆管病变的主要手段。对于恶性胆管狭窄的姑息治疗也是如此。手术应保留给微创方法失败的患者以及恶性病变的根治性治疗。