van der Velde Nathalie, Stricker Bruno H Ch, Pols Huib A P, van der Cammen Tischa J M
Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;63(2):232-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02736.x. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
AIMS: Falling in older persons is a frequent and serious clinical problem. Several drugs have been associated with increased fall risk. The objective of this study was to identify differences in the incidence of falls after withdrawal (discontinuation or dose reduction) of fall-risk-increasing drugs as a single intervention in older fallers. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of geriatric outpatients, we included 139 patients presenting with one or more falls during the previous year. Fall-risk-increasing drugs were withdrawn, if possible. The incidence of falls was assessed within 2 months of follow-up after a set 1 month period of drug withdrawal. Multivariate adjustment for potential confounders was performed with a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In 67 patients, we were able to discontinue a fall-risk-increasing drug, and in eight patients to reduce its dose. The total number of fall incidents during follow-up was significantly lower in these 75 patients, than in those who continued treatment (mean number of falls: 0.3 vs. 3.6; P value 0.025). The hazard ratio of a fall during follow-up was 0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23, 0.99) for overall drug withdrawal, 0.35 (95% CI 0.15, 0.82) for cardiovascular drug withdrawal and 0.56 (95% CI 0.23, 1.38) for psychotropic drug withdrawal, after adjustment for age, gender, use of fall-risk-increasing drugs, baseline falls frequency, comorbidity, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and reason for referral. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of fall-risk-increasing drugs appears to be effective as a single intervention for falls prevention in a geriatric outpatient setting. The effect was greatest for withdrawal of cardiovascular drugs.
目的:老年人跌倒为常见且严重的临床问题。多种药物与跌倒风险增加相关。本研究的目的是确定在老年跌倒者中,作为单一干预措施停用(停药或减量)增加跌倒风险药物后跌倒发生率的差异。 方法:在一项老年门诊患者的前瞻性队列研究中,我们纳入了139例在过去一年中发生过一次或多次跌倒的患者。如有可能,停用增加跌倒风险的药物。在设定的1个月停药期后的2个月随访期内评估跌倒发生率。使用Cox比例风险模型对潜在混杂因素进行多变量调整。 结果:在67例患者中,我们能够停用一种增加跌倒风险的药物,8例患者能够减少其剂量。这75例患者随访期间的跌倒事件总数显著低于继续治疗的患者(平均跌倒次数:0.3对3.6;P值0.025)。在对年龄、性别、使用增加跌倒风险的药物、基线跌倒频率、合并症、简易精神状态检查表评分和转诊原因进行调整后,总体停药后随访期间跌倒的风险比为0.48(95%置信区间(CI)0.23,0.99),心血管药物停药后为0.35(95%CI 0.15,0.82),精神药物停药后为0.56(95%CI 0.23,1.38)。 结论:停用增加跌倒风险的药物作为老年门诊预防跌倒的单一干预措施似乎有效。心血管药物停药的效果最为显著。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007-2
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007-5
Acad Emerg Med. 2009-3
Ann Pharmacother. 2012-8-7
N Engl J Med. 1997-10-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-3-31
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002-10
Age Ageing. 2001-11
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999-1