• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DNA evidence in rape cases and the Debbie Smith Act: forensic practice and criminal justice implications.

作者信息

Telsavaara Terhi V T, Arrigo Bruce A

机构信息

University of North Carolina-Charlotte, NC 28223-0001, USA.

出版信息

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006 Oct;50(5):487-505. doi: 10.1177/0306624X05285929.

DOI:10.1177/0306624X05285929
PMID:16943376
Abstract

The Debbie Smith or "Justice for All" Act was passed on November 1, 2004. The act addresses the problem of collecting and analyzing DNA evidence from backlogged rape kits sitting in crime laboratories around the country. Presently, no empirical data exist by which to assess the soundness of the legislation. However, the act clearly affects discrete operations within the forensic and criminal justice systems. This article explores the relative merits of the Debbie Smith law, highlighting changes in Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) programs, law enforcement, court administration, correctional treatment, and juvenile justice practices. Concerns linked to the likely impact of the "Justice for All" Act raise significant questions about its overall programmatic utility and treatment efficacy.

摘要

相似文献

1
DNA evidence in rape cases and the Debbie Smith Act: forensic practice and criminal justice implications.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006 Oct;50(5):487-505. doi: 10.1177/0306624X05285929.
2
Crime and punishment.罪与罚
Nat Med. 2006 Oct;12(10):1110-1. doi: 10.1038/nm1006-1110. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
3
DNA typing: a most useful forensic tool.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006 Oct;50(5):483-6. doi: 10.1177/0306624X06291664.
4
Waiting for justice in an era of exonerations.在一个宣告无罪的时代等待正义。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(4):408-11.
5
Forgotten evidence: A mixed methods study of why sexual assault kits (SAKs) are not submitted for DNA forensic testing.被遗忘的证据:一项关于为什么性侵犯工具包 (SAKs) 未提交进行 DNA 法医检测的混合方法研究。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;41(5):454-467. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000252. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
6
Understanding how advocates can affect sexual assault victim engagement in the criminal justice process.了解倡导者如何影响性侵犯受害者参与刑事司法程序。
J Interpers Violence. 2015 Jul;30(12):1987-97. doi: 10.1177/0886260514552273. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
7
The Effects of Legislation Mandating DNA Testing in Sexual Assault Cases: Results in Texas.立法强制在性侵案件中进行 DNA 检测的效果:德克萨斯州的结果。
Violence Against Women. 2020 Apr;26(5):417-437. doi: 10.1177/1077801219838330. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
8
Prosecution of adult sexual assault cases: a longitudinal analysis of the impact of a sexual assault nurse examiner program.成人性侵案件的起诉:性侵护士检查官项目的纵向分析对其影响。
Violence Against Women. 2012 Feb;18(2):223-44. doi: 10.1177/1077801212440158.
9
The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform.多伯特法则与刑事司法(几乎)无关及改革建议
Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S107-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.056333.
10
Changing the Criminal Justice System Response to Sexual Assault: An Empirical Study of a Participatory Action Research Project.改变刑事司法系统对性侵犯的应对方式:一项参与式行动研究项目的实证研究
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Mar;67(1-2):166-178. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12428. Epub 2020 Jun 8.