Ball Samuel A, Todd Michael, Tennen Howard, Armeli Stephen, Mohr Cynthia, Affleck Glenn, Kranzler Henry R
Yale School of Medicine, VA CT Healthcare (151D), 950 Campbell Avenue-Bldg. 35, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
Addict Behav. 2007 Jun;32(6):1105-18. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.07.014. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
Two brief (3-session) interventions were evaluated in a community sample of 98 non-dependent heavy drinking adults. Three weeks of intensive daily monitoring of drinking using a hand-held computer were completed before and after a 3-week intervention phase in which participants were randomly assigned to a brief coping skills, brief motivational enhancement, or waiting list condition. Waiting list participants drank more before, during, and after the brief intervention than brief intervention subjects, but all participants demonstrated reductions in drinking amount and frequency. No differences in drinking were found between the two brief interventions. The potential value of intensive daily monitoring as a tool for non-alcohol dependent individuals interested in reducing their drinking was considered.
在98名非依赖型重度饮酒成年人的社区样本中评估了两种简短(3个疗程)干预措施。在为期3周的干预阶段前后,使用手持计算机对饮酒情况进行了为期3周的密集每日监测,在此期间,参与者被随机分配到简短应对技能组、简短动机增强组或等待名单组。等待名单组的参与者在简短干预之前、期间和之后的饮酒量均高于简短干预组的参与者,但所有参与者的饮酒量和饮酒频率均有所降低。两种简短干预措施在饮酒方面未发现差异。研究还考虑了密集每日监测作为一种工具对于有兴趣减少饮酒的非酒精依赖个体的潜在价值。