• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对大学生饮酒者的简短酒精干预:面对面干预与计算机化反馈

Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: face-to-face versus computerized feedback.

作者信息

Butler Leon H, Correia Christopher J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Auburn University, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Mar;23(1):163-7. doi: 10.1037/a0014892.

DOI:10.1037/a0014892
PMID:19290702
Abstract

Research has demonstrated that brief interventions featuring personalized feedback can be used to decrease alcohol use among heavy-drinking college students. The current study investigated the efficacy of face-to-face and computer delivered interventions relative to an assessment-only control condition. The content of the personalized feedback was identical across the face-to-face and computerized conditions. There were 84 at-risk students assessed before, and 4 weeks after, the delivery of the interventions. The results suggest that both face-to-face and computerized interventions were equally successful in reducing the quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption, and that both interventions were more effective than the control condition. Participants also rated both interventions as acceptable, although the face-to-face intervention was given a more favorable rating. These initial results suggest that computerized interventions can be used to efficiently reduce alcohol use among college students. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

研究表明,具有个性化反馈的简短干预措施可用于减少重度饮酒的大学生的酒精摄入量。本研究调查了面对面干预和计算机化干预相对于仅进行评估的对照条件的效果。在面对面和计算机化条件下,个性化反馈的内容是相同的。在干预措施实施前和实施4周后,对84名有风险的学生进行了评估。结果表明,面对面干预和计算机化干预在减少酒精消费的数量和频率方面同样成功,且两种干预措施都比对照条件更有效。参与者对两种干预措施的评价也都可以接受,不过面对面干预得到了更积极的评价。这些初步结果表明,计算机化干预措施可用于有效减少大学生的酒精摄入量。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2009美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: face-to-face versus computerized feedback.针对大学生饮酒者的简短酒精干预:面对面干预与计算机化反馈
Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Mar;23(1):163-7. doi: 10.1037/a0014892.
2
Controlled study of brief personalized assessment-feedback for drinkers interested in self-help.针对有自助意愿的饮酒者进行简短个性化评估反馈的对照研究。
Addiction. 2007 Feb;102(2):241-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01682.x.
3
The efficacy of a targeted personalized drinking feedback intervention among intercollegiate athletes: a randomized controlled trial.针对大学生运动员的目标个性化饮酒反馈干预的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Dec;24(4):660-9. doi: 10.1037/a0020299.
4
Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.针对大学生饮酒者的简短动机干预的效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):728-33.
5
Evaluation of two Web-based alcohol interventions for mandated college students.对两类针对强制要求参与的大学生的基于网络的酒精干预措施的评估。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Jan;36(1):65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.05.009. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
6
Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention.针对被要求参加的大学生进行的简短物质使用干预的长期效果:面对面个人反馈干预的潜在效应
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Aug;31(8):1380-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00435.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
7
Brief motivational intervention and alcohol expectancy challenge with heavy drinking college students: a randomized factorial study.针对酗酒大学生的简短动机干预与酒精预期挑战:一项随机析因研究。
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2509-28. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
8
Feasibility of an email-based electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) to college students in Sweden.基于电子邮件的电子筛查与简短干预(e-SBI)对瑞典大学生的可行性。
Addict Behav. 2006 May;31(5):777-87. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.06.002. Epub 2005 Jul 5.
9
Randomized trial comparing computer-delivered and face-to-face personalized feedback interventions for high-risk drinking among college students.随机试验比较了针对大学生高危饮酒问题的计算机传递和面对面个性化反馈干预措施。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Sep;43(2):260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
10
Using personalized feedback to reduce alcohol use among hazardous drinking college students: the moderating effect of alcohol-related negative consequences.利用个性化反馈减少危险饮酒大学生的饮酒量:酒精相关负面后果的调节作用。
Addict Behav. 2011 May;36(5):539-42. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Review article: Electronic screening and brief intervention for alcohol-related trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.综述文章:酒精相关创伤的电子筛查与简短干预:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14506. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14506. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Raising the barcode: improving medication safety behaviours through a behavioural science-informed feedback intervention. A quality improvement project and difference-in-difference analysis.提高条形码:通过行为科学知情反馈干预提高药物安全行为。一个质量改进项目和差异分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Sep 19;33(10):682-690. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016868.
3
Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.
动机性访谈减少物质使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 12;12(12):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.
4
Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for Community College Students (BASICCS): Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of web-conferencing BASICCS and supporting automated text messages.社区大学生简短酒精筛查与干预(BASICCS):网络会议 BASICCS 及辅助自动化短信的可行性和初步效果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2021 Nov;35(7):840-851. doi: 10.1037/adb0000745. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
The efficacy of Personalized Normative Feedback interventions across addictions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.个性化规范反馈干预在成瘾治疗中的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0248262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248262. eCollection 2021.
6
Participant Satisfaction with Computer-Delivered Intervention Components and Its Relation to Alcohol Outcomes.参与者对计算机干预组件的满意度及其与酒精使用结果的关系。
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(14):2332-2340. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1811343. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
7
Descriptive Norms but not Harm Reduction Strategies as a Mediator of Personalized Boosters After a Computerized College Drinking Intervention.描述性规范而非减少伤害策略作为计算机辅助大学生饮酒干预后个性化助推器的中介因素。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jan;44(1):284-296. doi: 10.1111/acer.14248. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
Incorporating Writing into a Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention to Reduce Problem Drinking Among College Students.将写作融入个性化规范反馈干预中,以减少大学生的问题性饮酒。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;43(5):916-926. doi: 10.1111/acer.13995. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of Brief Alcohol Interventions for College Students: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis.大学生简短酒精干预措施的比较效果:来自网络荟萃分析的结果。
Prev Sci. 2019 Jul;20(5):715-740. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0960-z.
10
Enrollment and assessment of a first-year college class social network for a controlled trial of the indirect effect of a brief motivational intervention.为一项简短动机干预间接效果的对照试验,对一年级大学生班级社交网络进行招募和评估。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Jan;76:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Nov 1.