Wood Mark D, Capone Christy, Laforge Robert, Erickson Darin J, Brand Nancy H
University of Rhode Island, Department of Psychology, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2509-28. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
This study is the first reported test of the unique and combined effects of Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI) and Alcohol Expectancy Challenge (AEC) with heavy drinking college students. Three hundred and thirty-five participants were randomly assigned in a 2x2 factorial design to either: BMI, AEC, BMI and AEC, and assessment only conditions. Follow-ups occurred at 1, 3, and 6 months. Unconditional latent curve analyses suggested that alcohol use (Q-F), heavy episodic drinking, and alcohol problems were best modeled as quadratic effects. BMI produced significant decreases in Q-F, heavy drinking, and problems, while AEC produced significant decreases in Q-F and heavy drinking. There was no evidence of an additive effect of combining the interventions. Intervention effects decayed somewhat for BMI and completely for AEC over 6 months. Multi-group analyses suggested similar intervention effects for men and women. BMI effects on alcohol problems were mediated by perceived norms. These findings extend previous research with BMI and AEC but do not support their utility as a combined preventive intervention to reduce collegiate alcohol abuse.
本研究首次报告了针对大量饮酒的大学生进行的简短动机干预(BMI)和酒精预期挑战(AEC)的独特及联合效应测试。335名参与者按2×2析因设计被随机分配至以下条件:BMI组、AEC组、BMI与AEC联合组以及仅评估组。在1个月、3个月和6个月时进行随访。无条件潜在曲线分析表明,酒精使用(Q-F)、重度饮酒发作及酒精问题最好用二次效应模型来模拟。BMI使Q-F、重度饮酒及问题显著减少,而AEC使Q-F和重度饮酒显著减少。没有证据表明联合干预有相加效应。在6个月期间,BMI的干预效果有所衰减,而AEC的干预效果则完全消失。多组分析表明,男性和女性的干预效果相似。BMI对酒精问题的影响通过感知规范来介导。这些发现扩展了先前关于BMI和AEC的研究,但不支持将它们作为减少大学生酒精滥用的联合预防干预措施的效用。