Slattery James A, Page Amanda J, Dorian Camilla L, Brierley Stuart M, Blackshaw L Ashley
Nerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
J Physiol. 2006 Nov 15;577(Pt 1):295-306. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117762. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
Glutamate acts at central synapses via ionotropic (iGluR--NMDA, AMPA and kainate) and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Group I mGluRs are excitatory whilst group II and III are inhibitory. Inhibitory mGluRs also modulate peripherally the mechanosensitivity of gastro-oesophageal vagal afferents. Here we determined the potential of excitatory GluRs to play an opposing role in modulating vagal afferent mechanosensitivity, and investigated expression of receptor subunit mRNA within the nodose ganglion. The responses of mouse gastro-oesophageal vagal afferents to graded mechanical stimuli were investigated before and during application of selective GluR ligands to their peripheral endings. Two types of vagal afferents were tested: tension receptors, which respond to circumferential tension, and mucosal receptors, which respond only to mucosal stroking. The selective iGluR agonists NMDA and AMPA concentration-dependently potentiated afferent responses. Their corresponding antagonists AP-5 and NBQX alone attenuated mechanosensory responses as did the non-selective antagonist kynurenate. The kainate selective agonist SYM-2081 had minor effects on mechanosensitivity, and the antagonist UBP 302 was ineffective. The mGluR5 antagonist MTEP concentration-dependently inhibited mechanosensitivity. Efficacy of agonists and antagonists differed on mucosal and tension receptors. We conclude that excitatory modulation of afferent mechanosensitivity occurs mainly via NMDA, AMPA and mGlu5 receptors, and the role of each differs according to afferent subtypes. PCR data indicated that all NMDA, kainate and AMPA receptor subunits plus mGluR5 are expressed, and are therefore candidates for the neuromodulation we observed.
谷氨酸通过离子型谷氨酸受体(离子型谷氨酸受体——N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体、α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体和海人酸受体)和代谢型谷氨酸受体在中枢突触发挥作用。I 组代谢型谷氨酸受体具有兴奋性,而 II 组和 III 组则具有抑制性。抑制性代谢型谷氨酸受体还可在外周调节胃食管迷走传入神经的机械敏感性。在此,我们确定了兴奋性谷氨酸受体在调节迷走传入神经机械敏感性方面发挥相反作用的可能性,并研究了结节神经节内受体亚基 mRNA 的表达。在向小鼠胃食管迷走传入神经的外周末梢施加选择性谷氨酸受体配体之前和期间,研究了其对分级机械刺激的反应。测试了两种类型的迷走传入神经:对圆周张力作出反应的张力感受器和仅对粘膜抚摸作出反应的粘膜感受器。选择性离子型谷氨酸受体激动剂 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸和α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸浓度依赖性地增强传入反应。它们相应的拮抗剂 AP-5 和 NBQX 单独使用时会减弱机械感觉反应,非选择性拮抗剂犬尿烯酸也是如此。海人酸选择性激动剂 SYM-2081 对机械敏感性影响较小,拮抗剂 UBP 302 无效。代谢型谷氨酸受体 5 拮抗剂 MTEP 浓度依赖性地抑制机械敏感性。激动剂和拮抗剂对粘膜感受器和张力感受器的作用效果不同。我们得出结论,传入神经机械敏感性的兴奋性调节主要通过 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体、α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体和代谢型谷氨酸受体 5 受体发生,并且每种受体的作用因传入神经亚型而异。聚合酶链反应数据表明,所有 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体、海人酸受体和α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体亚基以及代谢型谷氨酸受体 5 均有表达,因此是我们观察到的神经调节的候选者。