Song Joo-Hyun, Nakayama Ken
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, WJH 710, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Feb;177(2):223-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0667-4. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
Turning off a fixation point, typically for 200 ms, before the onset of a peripheral target substantially reduces saccadic reaction times. This facilitatory effect generated by an inserted temporal gap between fixation offset and the target appearance is called the "gap" effect [J Opt Soc Am 57:1030-1033, 1967]. We show that the gap reduces the initial latency of both saccades and manual pointing in single and multiple target displays. Yet, in multiple target displays, the gap increased the movement duration because eye or hand movements were frequently misdirected toward distractors so that the trajectory had to be corrected. Thus, in spite of the shortened latency, the total time for trial completion was not shortened in multiple target displays, whereas it was reduced in single target displays. This selective gap effect for a single target was not restricted to goal-directed motor tasks because perceptual discrimination tasks, where no motor response is required, also demonstrated the gap effect only for single target displays. Our results suggest that the gap may facilitate attentional disengagement, but it does not help target selection in motor and perceptual discrimination tasks, where the allocation of attention to the target is required.
在周边目标出现之前关闭注视点,通常持续200毫秒,可大幅缩短扫视反应时间。由注视点偏移与目标出现之间插入的时间间隔所产生的这种促进作用被称为“间隙”效应[《美国光学学会志》57:1030 - 1033, 1967]。我们发现,在单目标和多目标显示中,间隙都会缩短扫视和手动指向的初始延迟。然而,在多目标显示中,间隙会增加运动持续时间,因为眼睛或手部运动经常会被误导向干扰物,从而不得不修正轨迹。因此,尽管延迟缩短了,但在多目标显示中试验完成的总时间并未缩短,而在单目标显示中则有所减少。这种单目标的选择性间隙效应并不局限于目标导向的运动任务,因为在不需要运动反应的知觉辨别任务中,也仅在单目标显示中表现出间隙效应。我们的结果表明,间隙可能有助于注意力脱离,但在需要将注意力分配到目标的运动和知觉辨别任务中,它无助于目标选择。