• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猕猴中视觉引导抓握的目标选择

Target selection for visually guided reaching in macaque.

作者信息

Song Joo-Hyun, Takahashi Naomi, McPeek Robert M

机构信息

Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2318 Fillmore St., San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jan;99(1):14-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.01106.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1152/jn.01106.2007
PMID:17989239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2365509/
Abstract

We examined target selection for visually guided reaching in monkeys using a visual search task in which an odd-colored target was presented with distractors. The colors of the target and distractors were randomly switched in each trial between red and green, and the number of distractors was varied. Previous studies of saccades and attention have shown that target selection in this task is easier when a greater number of homogenous distractors is present. We found that monkeys made fewer reaches to distractors and that reaches to the target were completed more quickly when a greater number of homogenous distractors was present. When the target was presented in a sparse array of distractors, reaches had longer movement durations and greater trajectory curvature. Reaching errors were directed more often to a distractor adjacent to the target, suggesting a spatially coarse-to-fine progression during target selection. Reaches were also influenced by the properties of trials in the recent past. When the colors of the target and distractors remained the same from trial to trial rather than switching, reaches were completed more quickly and accurately, indicating that color priming across trials facilitates target selection. Moreover, when difficult search trials were randomly intermixed with easier trials without distractors, reach latencies were influenced by the difficulty of previous trials, indicating that motor initiation strategies are gradually adjusted based on accumulated experience. Overall, these results are consistent with reaching results in humans, indicating that the monkey provides a sound model for understanding the neural underpinnings of reach target selection.

摘要

我们使用视觉搜索任务来研究猴子在视觉引导下伸手抓取目标的目标选择情况,在该任务中,一个颜色奇特的目标与干扰物一起呈现。目标和干扰物的颜色在每次试验中随机在红色和绿色之间切换,并且干扰物的数量也有所变化。先前关于扫视和注意力的研究表明,当存在更多数量的同质干扰物时,此任务中的目标选择会更容易。我们发现,当存在更多数量的同质干扰物时,猴子伸向干扰物的次数减少,并且伸向目标的动作完成得更快。当目标出现在稀疏的干扰物阵列中时,伸手动作的持续时间更长,轨迹曲率更大。伸手错误更常指向与目标相邻的干扰物,这表明在目标选择过程中存在从空间上的粗略到精细的进展。伸手动作还受到近期试验特性的影响。当目标和干扰物的颜色在每次试验中保持不变而不是切换时,伸手动作完成得更快且更准确,这表明跨试验的颜色启动有助于目标选择。此外,当困难的搜索试验与无干扰物的较容易试验随机混合时,伸手潜伏期会受到先前试验难度的影响,这表明运动启动策略会根据积累的经验逐渐调整。总体而言,这些结果与人类的伸手结果一致,表明猴子为理解伸手目标选择的神经基础提供了一个可靠的模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/05ea3cbfd9da/nihms45340f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/8ef65cb223ec/nihms45340f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/b2f02a8ae2c2/nihms45340f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/6e5f485fad08/nihms45340f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/520342023c6e/nihms45340f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/824eca0050ca/nihms45340f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/f773ff7a462b/nihms45340f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/05ea3cbfd9da/nihms45340f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/8ef65cb223ec/nihms45340f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/b2f02a8ae2c2/nihms45340f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/6e5f485fad08/nihms45340f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/520342023c6e/nihms45340f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/824eca0050ca/nihms45340f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/f773ff7a462b/nihms45340f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b96/2365509/05ea3cbfd9da/nihms45340f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Target selection for visually guided reaching in macaque.猕猴中视觉引导抓握的目标选择
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jan;99(1):14-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.01106.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
2
Eye-hand coordination during target selection in a pop-out visual search.在弹出式视觉搜索中进行目标选择时的眼手协调。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Nov;102(5):2681-92. doi: 10.1152/jn.91352.2008. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
3
Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories.运动轨迹揭示的视觉搜索中的目标选择
Vision Res. 2008 Mar;48(7):853-61. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.015. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
4
Influence of stimulus color on the control of reaching-grasping movements.刺激颜色对抓握动作控制的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Mar;137(1):36-44. doi: 10.1007/s002210000639.
5
Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays.注视偏移有助于扫视和手动伸向单个而非多个目标显示器。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Feb;177(2):223-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0667-4. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
6
Properties of saccadic responses in monkey when multiple competing visual stimuli are present.当存在多个相互竞争的视觉刺激时猴子扫视反应的特性。
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;91(2):890-900. doi: 10.1152/jn.00818.2003. Epub 2003 Oct 15.
7
Reaching affects saccade trajectories.到达会影响扫视轨迹。
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Jan;136(2):241-9. doi: 10.1007/s002210000577.
8
Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: curved saccade trajectories.扫视目标选择中的多感官交互:曲线扫视轨迹
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jan;142(1):116-30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0919-2. Epub 2001 Nov 9.
9
Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during a visual search task.视觉搜索任务期间上丘中的扫视目标选择
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;88(4):2019-34. doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.4.2019.
10
The visual properties of proximal and remote distractors differentially influence reaching planning times: evidence from pro- and antipointing tasks.近端和远端干扰物的视觉属性对伸手计划时间有不同影响:来自正向和反向指向任务的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Nov;234(11):3259-3268. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4723-4. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Online Movements Reflect Ongoing Deliberation.线上运动反映了持续的审议过程。
J Neurosci. 2025 Jul 30;45(31):e1913242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1913-24.2025.
2
Characterizing individual differences in selection history bias manifested in goal-directed reaching movements.刻画目标导向性伸手运动中表现出的选择历史偏差的个体差异。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03068-9.
3
Effector-independent Representations Guide Sequential Target Selection Biases in Action.效应器独立的表示指导动作中连续目标选择的偏向。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Mar 1;36(3):492-507. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02102.
4
Continuous action with a neurobiologically inspired computational approach reveals the dynamics of selection history.连续动作与神经生物学启发的计算方法揭示了选择历史的动态。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jul 17;19(7):e1011283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011283. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Rethinking Vision and Action.重新思考视觉与行动
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:59-86. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-021422-043229.
6
Active vision during prey capture in wild marmoset monkeys.野生狨猴在捕食过程中的主动视觉。
Curr Biol. 2022 Aug 8;32(15):3423-3428.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.028. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
Target detection and discrimination in pop-out visual search with two targets.双目标弹出式视觉搜索中的目标检测与辨别。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1538-1552. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02495-2. Epub 2022 May 3.
8
Selective Influence and Sequential Operations: A Research Strategy for Visual Search.选择性影响与序列操作:视觉搜索的一种研究策略。
Vis cogn. 2019;27(5-8):387-415. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1659896. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
9
Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.计算机鼠标追踪揭示了空间语言基础认知任务中的运动特征。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2424-2460. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01847-9.
10
Abandoning and modifying one action plan for alternatives.放弃并修改一个行动计划以采用其他方案。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 19;372(1718). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0195.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic adjustment of visuomotor readiness.视觉运动准备的自动调整。
J Vis. 2007 Mar 20;7(5):2.1-9. doi: 10.1167/7.5.2.
2
Target selection: choice or response?目标选择:是选择还是反应?
J Neurosci. 2007 Jun 6;27(23):6079-80. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1454-07.2007.
3
Target selection signals for arm reaching in the posterior parietal cortex.顶叶后部皮层中手臂伸展的目标选择信号。
J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 21;27(8):2001-12. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4274-06.2007.
4
Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing.集中注意力对视觉引导手动指向的潜伏期和轨迹的作用。
J Vis. 2006 Aug 30;6(9):982-95. doi: 10.1167/6.9.11.
5
Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: a computational model.用于定义潜在行动并在其中做出决策的整合神经过程:一种计算模型。
J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 20;26(38):9761-70. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5605-05.2006.
6
Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays.注视偏移有助于扫视和手动伸向单个而非多个目标显示器。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Feb;177(2):223-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0667-4. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
7
Incomplete suppression of distractor-related activity in the frontal eye field results in curved saccades.额叶眼区中与干扰物相关活动的不完全抑制会导致弧形扫视。
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2699-711. doi: 10.1152/jn.00564.2006. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
8
The control of saccade trajectories: direction of curvature depends on prior knowledge of target location and saccade latency.扫视轨迹的控制:曲率方向取决于目标位置的先验知识和扫视潜伏期。
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Jan;68(1):129-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03193663.
9
Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field.额叶眼区隐蔽空间注意的神经元基础。
J Neurosci. 2005 Oct 12;25(41):9479-87. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0741-05.2005.
10
Target selection in eye-hand coordination: Do we reach to where we look or do we look to where we reach?眼手协调中的目标选择:我们是看向哪里就伸手到哪里,还是伸手到哪里就看向哪里?
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(2):187-95. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0038-6. Epub 2005 Nov 15.