Vujanovic Anka A, Zvolensky Michael J, Bernstein Amit, Feldner Matthew T, McLeish Alison C
The University of Vermont, Department of Psychology, 2 Colchester Avenue, John Dewey Hall, Burlington, VT 05405-0134, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jun;45(6):1393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
The present investigation sought to examine the interactive effects of anxiety sensitivity [AS; Reiss, S., & McNally, R. J. (1985). Expectancy model of fear. In S. Reiss, & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 107-121). San Diego: Academic Press] and mindfulness [Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefit of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822-848] in predicting panic-relevant processes. A community sample of 248 individuals participated in the study by completing a battery of self-report instruments. Consistent with prediction, the interaction between AS and mindfulness significantly predicted anxious arousal symptoms and agoraphobic cognitions, above and beyond the individual main effects, and did not significantly predict anhedonic depression symptoms. Contrary to prediction, the AS by mindfulness interaction did not significantly predict body vigilance. Theoretical implications are discussed and future directions are delineated.
本研究旨在探讨焦虑敏感性[AS;赖斯,S.,&麦克纳利,R. J.(1985)。恐惧的预期模型。载于S.赖斯,&R. R.布津(编),行为治疗的理论问题(第107 - 121页)。圣地亚哥:学术出版社]和正念[布朗,K. W.,&瑞安,R. M.(2003)。活在当下的益处:正念及其在心理健康中的作用。《人格与社会心理学杂志》,84,822 - 848]在预测与惊恐相关过程中的交互作用。一个由248名个体组成的社区样本通过完成一系列自我报告工具参与了该研究。与预测一致,AS与正念之间的交互作用显著预测了焦虑唤醒症状和广场恐惧症认知,超出了个体主效应,且未显著预测快感缺失性抑郁症状。与预测相反,AS与正念交互作用未显著预测身体警觉性。讨论了理论意义并阐述了未来方向。