Suppr超能文献

第19章:宫颈癌筛查的成本效益

Chapter 19: Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening.

作者信息

Goldie Sue J, Kim Jane J, Myers Evan

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.114. Epub 2006 Jun 22.

Abstract

In the last two decades, computer-based models of cervical cancer screening have been used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different secondary prevention policies. Analyses in countries with existing screening programs have focused on identifying the optimal screening interval, ages for starting and stopping screening, and consideration of enhancements to conventional cytology, such as human papillomavirus (HPV)-DNA testing as a triage for equivocal results or as a primary screening test for women over the age of 30. Analyses in resource-poor settings with infrequent or no screening have focused on strategies that enhance the linkage between screening and treatment, consider noncytologic alternatives such as HPV-DNA testing, and target women between the ages of 35 and 45 for screening one, two, or three times per lifetime. Despite differences in methods and assumptions, this paper identifies the qualitative themes that are consistent among studies, and highlights important methodological challenges and high-priority areas for further work.

摘要

在过去二十年中,基于计算机的宫颈癌筛查模型已被用于评估不同二级预防政策的成本效益。在已有筛查项目的国家进行的分析,重点在于确定最佳筛查间隔、开始和停止筛查的年龄,以及对传统细胞学检查进行改进的考量,比如将人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)-DNA检测用作对不确定结果的分流手段,或作为30岁以上女性的初次筛查检测。在筛查频率低或无筛查的资源匮乏地区进行的分析,重点在于加强筛查与治疗之间联系的策略,考虑诸如HPV-DNA检测等非细胞学替代方法,并将35至45岁的女性作为一生筛查一、二或三次的目标人群。尽管方法和假设存在差异,但本文确定了各研究中一致的定性主题,并突出了重要的方法学挑战以及有待进一步开展工作的高优先领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验