Goldie Sue J, Gaffikin Lynne, Goldhaber-Fiebert Jeremy D, Gordillo-Tobar Amparo, Levin Carol, Mahé Cédric, Wright Thomas C
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 17;353(20):2158-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa044278.
Cervical-cancer screening strategies that involve the use of conventional cytology and require multiple visits have been impractical in developing countries.
We used computer-based models to assess the cost-effectiveness of a variety of cervical-cancer screening strategies in India, Kenya, Peru, South Africa, and Thailand. Primary data were combined with data from the literature to estimate age-specific incidence and mortality rates for cancer and the effectiveness of screening for and treatment of precancerous lesions. We assessed the direct medical, time, and program-related costs of strategies that differed according to screening test, targeted age and frequency, and number of clinic visits required. Single-visit strategies involved the assumption that screening and treatment could be provided in the same day. Outcomes included the lifetime risk of cancer, years of life saved, lifetime costs, and cost-effectiveness ratios (cost per year of life saved).
The most cost-effective strategies were those that required the fewest visits, resulting in improved follow-up testing and treatment. Screening women once in their lifetime, at the age of 35 years, with a one-visit or two-visit screening strategy involving visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid or DNA testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical cell samples, reduced the lifetime risk of cancer by approximately 25 to 36 percent, and cost less than 500 dollars per year of life saved. Relative cancer risk declined by an additional 40 percent with two screenings (at 35 and 40 years of age), resulting in a cost per year of life saved that was less than each country's per capita gross domestic product--a very cost-effective result, according to the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health.
Cervical-cancer screening strategies incorporating visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid or DNA testing for HPV in one or two clinical visits are cost-effective alternatives to conventional three-visit cytology-based screening programs in resource-poor settings.
涉及使用传统细胞学检查且需要多次就诊的宫颈癌筛查策略在发展中国家并不实用。
我们使用基于计算机的模型评估了印度、肯尼亚、秘鲁、南非和泰国多种宫颈癌筛查策略的成本效益。将原始数据与文献数据相结合,以估计特定年龄的癌症发病率和死亡率以及癌前病变筛查和治疗的有效性。我们评估了因筛查测试、目标年龄和频率以及所需就诊次数不同而有所差异的策略的直接医疗成本、时间成本和项目相关成本。单次就诊策略假定筛查和治疗可在同一天进行。结果包括癌症的终生风险、挽救的生命年数、终生成本和成本效益比(每挽救一年生命的成本)。
最具成本效益的策略是就诊次数最少的策略,从而改善了后续检测和治疗。在35岁时对女性进行一次终生筛查,采用单次或两次就诊的筛查策略,包括用醋酸目视检查宫颈或对宫颈细胞样本进行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA检测,可将癌症终生风险降低约25%至36%,且每挽救一年生命的成本低于500美元。进行两次筛查(35岁和40岁时各一次)可使相对癌症风险再降低40%,每挽救一年生命的成本低于每个国家的人均国内生产总值——根据宏观经济与卫生委员会的标准,这是一个极具成本效益的结果。
在资源匮乏地区,在一或两次临床就诊中采用醋酸目视检查宫颈或HPV DNA检测的宫颈癌筛查策略,是传统的三次就诊基于细胞学检查的筛查项目具有成本效益的替代方案。