Hamilton William G, Collier Matthew B, Tarabee Eshan, McAuley James P, Engh C Anderson, Engh Gerard A
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.010.
The goal of this report is to review reoperations undertaken on the initial 221 unicompartmental arthroplasties performed using a minimally invasive technique. A comparison was then performed between these cases and the previous 514 open medial unicompartmental arthroplasties performed at our institution. In the minimally invasive group, 9 (4.1%) of 221 knees were revised (8 for component loosening, 1 for deep infection). Of 212 unrevised knees, 16 have required a total of 18 nonrevision reoperations. Overall, 25 of 221 knees required at least 1 reoperation (total reoperation rate, 11.3%). Despite an accelerated recovery and decreased hospital stay in our minimally invasive unicompartmental arthroplasties, the rate of revision due to aseptic loosening (3.7% vs 1.0%) and the overall reoperation rate (11.3% vs 8.6%) compare unfavorably with those performed with an open technique.
本报告的目的是回顾采用微创技术进行的最初221例单髁关节置换术的再次手术情况。然后将这些病例与本院之前进行的514例开放式内侧单髁关节置换术进行比较。在微创组中,221例膝关节中有9例(4.1%)进行了翻修(8例因假体松动,1例因深部感染)。在212例未翻修的膝关节中,有16例共需要进行18次非翻修再次手术。总体而言,221例膝关节中有25例至少需要进行1次再次手术(总再次手术率为11.3%)。尽管我们的微创单髁关节置换术恢复加快且住院时间缩短,但无菌性松动导致的翻修率(3.7%对1.0%)和总体再次手术率(11.3%对8.6%)与开放式技术相比并不理想。