Fullarton Christie, Stokes Mark
School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, 3125 Victoria, Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.05.015. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
Workplace injuries are common and destructive to persons, organisations, and society. Various instruments presently exist that are designed to assess the factors underlying workplace injury. The study reports on the construct and predictive validity of a 46-item instrument, the safety perception survey (SPS), currently used to assess safety climate in industrial organisations throughout Australia. Initially, factor analysis was conducted on the data from a sample of 1238 employees from nine organisations, which indicated a one-factor solution, was the best fit. A structural equation model (SEM) linking injury rates to the safety climate measure for 16 sub-groups of six industrial organisations indicated that the measure contributed just 23% of the variance in injury rates. Interestingly, the results indicated that the number of employees was a better and more significant predictor of injury (R(2)=0.48). It is proposed that the SPS as is would need to be modified significantly from its current form to produce improvements in validity, as in its current form the survey is no more predictive of injury than organisational size. Future research into safety climate measures should incorporate predictive validity analysis on injury rates, as for many organisations; this is a performance outcome measure.
工作场所伤害很常见,对个人、组织和社会都具有破坏性。目前有各种工具旨在评估工作场所伤害背后的因素。该研究报告了一种包含46个项目的工具——安全感知调查(SPS)的结构效度和预测效度,该工具目前用于评估澳大利亚各地工业组织的安全氛围。最初,对来自九个组织的1238名员工样本的数据进行了因子分析,结果表明单因子解决方案是最佳拟合。一个将伤害率与六个工业组织的16个子组的安全氛围测量值联系起来的结构方程模型(SEM)表明,该测量值仅解释了伤害率方差的23%。有趣的是,结果表明员工数量是伤害的一个更好且更显著的预测指标(R(2)=0.48)。有人提出,现有的SPS需要从其当前形式进行重大修改,以提高效度,因为就其当前形式而言,该调查对伤害的预测能力并不比组织规模更强。对于许多组织来说,伤害率是一项绩效结果指标,未来关于安全氛围测量的研究应纳入对伤害率的预测效度分析。