Denison Eva, Asenlöf Pernilla, Sandborgh Maria, Lindberg Per
Section of Caring Sciences, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
J Pain. 2007 Jan;8(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
The purpose of this study was to identify and describe subgroup profiles based on self-reported pain intensity, disability, self-efficacy, fear of movement/(re)injury, and catastrophizing in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Two primary health care samples (n = 215 and n = 161) were used. Self-report questionnaires were completed at the start of physical therapy treatment. Cluster analysis was used to generate subgroups. Three subgroups were identified in sample 1 and replicated in sample 2. These were labeled "High self-efficacy-Low fear-avoidance," "Low self-efficacy-Low fear-avoidance," and "Low self-efficacy-High fear-avoidance." The subgroups differed significantly in work-status in both samples (P < .001), but not in age, gender, or duration of pain. The results show the presence of subgroups based on pain intensity, disability, self-efficacy, fear of movement/(re)injury, and catastrophizing. The profile patterns suggest that different management strategies may be relevant in each subgroup.
This article presents subgroups of patients with musculoskeletal pain with different profiles in pain intensity, disability, and psychosocial variables possible to modify by physical therapy management. The results could potentially aid clinicians in tailoring assessment and treatment approaches to each subgroup.
本研究的目的是根据自我报告的疼痛强度、功能障碍、自我效能感、对运动/(再)损伤的恐惧以及灾难化思维,识别并描述肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的亚组特征。使用了两个初级卫生保健样本(n = 215和n = 161)。在物理治疗开始时完成自我报告问卷。采用聚类分析生成亚组。在样本1中识别出三个亚组,并在样本2中得到重复。这些亚组被标记为“高自我效能感-低恐惧回避”、“低自我效能感-低恐惧回避”和“低自我效能感-高恐惧回避”。两个样本中的亚组在工作状态上存在显著差异(P <.001),但在年龄、性别或疼痛持续时间上没有差异。结果表明,基于疼痛强度、功能障碍、自我效能感、对运动/(再)损伤的恐惧以及灾难化思维存在亚组。这些特征模式表明,不同的管理策略可能适用于每个亚组。
本文介绍了肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的亚组,这些亚组在疼痛强度、功能障碍和心理社会变量方面具有不同特征,而这些变量可通过物理治疗管理进行调整。研究结果可能有助于临床医生为每个亚组量身定制评估和治疗方法。