Haidukewych George J, Jacofsky David J, Hanssen Arlen D, Lewallen David G
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Sep;88(9):1952-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00890.
The intraoperative occurrence of an acetabular fracture is a rare complication of primary total hip arthroplasty. Previous reports have lacked a sufficiently large number of subjects to allow for an analysis of the causes and appropriate treatment of this problem.
Between 1990 and 2000, 7121 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the records in our Total Joint Registry and found that twenty-one patients (twenty-one hips) had sustained an intraoperative acetabular fracture. Nineteen of these patients (nineteen hips) had been followed until revision or for a minimum of two years (mean duration of follow-up, forty-four months). We evaluated the anatomic location, cause, treatment, and outcome of the fractures. Acetabular component designs were categorized as modular, nonmodular (monoblock), true hemispherical, or elliptical, and then each design was analyzed for fracture risk.
No fractures occurred in association with cemented acetabular components. The fracture rate associated with uncemented components was 0.4%. In seventeen hips, the acetabular component was judged to be stable despite the detection of a fracture and the cup was retained. In four hips, the original cup was not stable and therefore was replaced with a design that allowed for supplemental screw fixation. All fractures united, and all cups demonstrated osseous ingrowth at the time of the most recent follow-up. Elliptical monoblock cups were associated with a significantly higher fracture rate than were elliptical modular cups (p < 0.0001) and hemispherical modular cups (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between elliptical modular and hemispherical modular components with regard to the fracture rate.
Acetabular fracture during primary total hip arthroplasty is a rare complication of acetabular fixation without cement. In the present series, retention of a stable cup was associated with uneventful osseous ingrowth and excellent early-term outcomes. We found a high rate of fracture in association with the use of monoblock elliptical components.
Therapeutic Level III.
髋臼骨折作为初次全髋关节置换术中一种罕见的并发症,以往的报道因样本数量不足,无法对该问题的成因及恰当治疗方法进行分析。
1990年至2000年间,我院共进行了7121例初次全髋关节置换术。我们对全关节置换登记系统中的记录进行了回顾性研究,发现21例患者(21髋)在术中发生了髋臼骨折。其中19例患者(19髋)接受了随访,直至进行翻修手术或至少随访两年(平均随访时间为44个月)。我们评估了骨折的解剖位置、成因、治疗方法及预后。髋臼假体的设计分为模块化、非模块化(一体式)、真半球形或椭圆形,然后分析每种设计的骨折风险。
骨水泥固定型髋臼假体未发生骨折。非骨水泥固定型假体的骨折发生率为0.4%。17例髋关节中,尽管检测到骨折,但髋臼假体被判定为稳定,髋臼杯得以保留。4例髋关节中,原髋臼杯不稳定,因此被更换为可进行补充螺钉固定的设计。所有骨折均愈合,在最近一次随访时,所有髋臼杯均显示有骨长入。一体式椭圆形髋臼杯的骨折发生率显著高于椭圆形模块化髋臼杯(p < 0.0001)和半球形模块化髋臼杯(p < 0.0001)。椭圆形模块化和半球形模块化假体在骨折发生率方面无显著差异。
初次全髋关节置换术中髋臼骨折是髋臼非骨水泥固定的一种罕见并发症。在本研究系列中,保留稳定的髋臼杯与骨长入顺利及良好的早期预后相关。我们发现使用一体式椭圆形假体时骨折发生率较高。
治疗性三级证据