Vettore Mario Vianna, Lamarca Gabriela de Almeida, Leão Anna Thereza Thomé, Thomaz Filipe Brand, Sheiham Aubrey, Leal Maria do Carmo
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2006 Oct;22(10):2041-53. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001000010.
The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate analytical studies on periodontal disease as a possible risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. A literature search of the MEDLINE, SciELO, and LILACS bibliographic databases and CAPES thesis database was conducted up to December 2005, covering epidemiological studies of periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Of the 964 papers identified, 36 analytical studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-six epidemiological studies reported associations between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes. There was a clear heterogeneity between studies concerning measurement of periodontal disease and selection of type of adverse pregnancy outcome. Therefore no meta-analysis was performed. Most studies did not control for confounders, thus raising serious doubts about their conclusions. The methodological limitations of most studies did not allow conclusions concerning the effects of periodontal disease on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Larger and methodologically rigorous analytical studies using reliable outcomes and exposure measures are recommended.
本系统评价的目的是评估关于牙周疾病作为不良妊娠结局潜在危险因素的分析性研究。截至2005年12月,我们对MEDLINE、SciELO、LILACS书目数据库以及CAPES论文数据库进行了文献检索,涵盖牙周疾病与不良妊娠结局的流行病学研究。在检索到的964篇论文中,有36项分析性研究符合纳入标准。26项流行病学研究报告了牙周疾病与不良妊娠结局之间的关联。在牙周疾病测量方法以及不良妊娠结局类型选择方面,各研究之间存在明显的异质性。因此未进行荟萃分析。大多数研究未对混杂因素进行控制,从而使其结论受到严重质疑。大多数研究的方法学局限性使得无法得出关于牙周疾病对不良妊娠结局影响的结论。建议开展规模更大且方法学严谨的分析性研究,采用可靠的结局指标和暴露测量方法。