Stovsky Mark D, Griffiths Robert I, Duff Steven B
Department of Urology, Case School of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1500-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.064.
We critically evaluated the clinical outcomes and cost characteristics of alternative procedural treatment options for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.
An outcomes and cost analysis was performed for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments, including photoselective vaporization, microwave thermotherapy, transurethral needle ablation, interstitial laser coagulation and transurethral resection. Clinical outcomes were measured by the percent improvement in American Urological Association/International Prostate Symptom Score, the maximum uroflowmetry rate and quality of life score. An economic simulation model was constructed to estimate the expected cost of benign prostatic hyperplasia procedural therapies from a payer perspective. The model included costs of initial treatment, followup care, adverse events and re-treatment. Sensitivity and threshold analyses tested the impact of changing model inputs on base case results.
Ablative therapies showed better improvement in symptom score, flow rate and quality of life score compared to thermotherapy procedures. Photoselective vaporization resulted in the largest beneficial changes in American Urological Association/International Prostate Symptom Score, the maximum uroflowmetry rate and the quality of life score at all time points evaluated, followed by transurethral resection and then interstitial laser coagulation. The estimated cost was lower for photoselective vaporization than for any other procedural option at any interval studied. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the results of baseline analyses were robust to reasonable changes in clinical and economic inputs to the model.
Compared to alternative treatment options photoselective vaporization of the prostate is a clinically efficacious and cost-effective treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.
我们严格评估了有症状良性前列腺增生症替代治疗方案的临床疗效和成本特征。
对良性前列腺增生症的治疗方法进行了疗效和成本分析,包括选择性光汽化术、微波热疗、经尿道针刺消融术、间质激光凝固术和经尿道前列腺切除术。临床疗效通过美国泌尿外科学会/国际前列腺症状评分的改善百分比、最大尿流率和生活质量评分来衡量。构建了一个经济模拟模型,从支付方的角度估计良性前列腺增生症治疗方法的预期成本。该模型包括初始治疗、后续护理、不良事件和再次治疗的成本。敏感性分析和阈值分析测试了模型输入变化对基础病例结果的影响。
与热疗方法相比,消融疗法在症状评分、尿流率和生活质量评分方面改善更明显。在所有评估时间点,选择性光汽化术在美国泌尿外科学会/国际前列腺症状评分、最大尿流率和生活质量评分方面带来的有益变化最大,其次是经尿道前列腺切除术,然后是间质激光凝固术。在任何研究时间段内,选择性光汽化术的估计成本均低于任何其他治疗方案。敏感性分析表明,基线分析结果对模型临床和经济输入的合理变化具有稳健性。
与其他治疗方案相比,前列腺选择性光汽化术是治疗有症状良性前列腺增生症的一种临床有效且具有成本效益的治疗方法。