• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性呼吸窘迫综合征网络低潮气量策略在小儿急性肺损伤中的应用。

Application of the acute respiratory distress syndrome network low-tidal volume strategy to pediatric acute lung injury.

作者信息

Hanson James H, Flori Heidi

机构信息

PICU Offices, Children's Hospital & Research Center Oakland, 747 52nd Street, Oakland, CA 94609, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care Clin N Am. 2006 Sep;12(3):349-57. doi: 10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.003
PMID:16952797
Abstract

In summary, most of the available data suggest that pediatric patients should be ventilated with low tidal volumes. The 6-mL/kg IBW tidal volume strategy as used in the ARDSNet studies is a reasonable target, having since been rigorously tested in several large, clinical trials (adult and pediatric). The mortality associated with ALI in these studies has never been lower, certainly supporting continued use of the 6 mL/kg target tidal volume as the "gold standard" and, thus, eliminating any equipoise in designing a pediatric trial comparing 6 mL/kg to a larger tidal volume. With mortality rates in children from ALI nearing 8% to 22% and with no clear surrogate outcomes identified to date, the sample sizes needed to show a significant clinical effect would be prohibitively large. Nonetheless, future research should compare 6 mL/kg IBW to even smaller tidal volumes or to high frequency ventilation in an attempt to further reduce the mortality associated with ALI and ARDS in the pediatric population.

摘要

总之,大多数现有数据表明,儿科患者应采用低潮气量通气。急性呼吸窘迫综合征网络(ARDSNet)研究中使用的6 mL/千克理想体重(IBW)潮气量策略是一个合理的目标,此后已在多项大型临床试验(成人和儿科)中得到严格验证。这些研究中与急性肺损伤(ALI)相关的死亡率从未如此之低,这无疑支持继续将6 mL/千克目标潮气量作为“金标准”,因此,在设计一项比较6 mL/千克与更大潮气量的儿科试验时,不存在任何权衡。由于儿童ALI的死亡率接近8%至22%,且迄今为止尚未确定明确的替代结局,要显示出显著临床效果所需的样本量将大得令人望而却步。尽管如此,未来的研究应将6 mL/千克IBW与更小的潮气量或高频通气进行比较,以进一步降低儿科人群中与ALI和ARDS相关的死亡率。

相似文献

1
Application of the acute respiratory distress syndrome network low-tidal volume strategy to pediatric acute lung injury.急性呼吸窘迫综合征网络低潮气量策略在小儿急性肺损伤中的应用。
Respir Care Clin N Am. 2006 Sep;12(3):349-57. doi: 10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.003.
2
Lung-protective mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes in patients not suffering from acute lung injury: a review of clinical studies.在非急性肺损伤患者中采用低潮气量的肺保护性机械通气:临床研究综述
Med Sci Monit. 2008 Feb;14(2):RA22-26.
3
Lung protective ventilation strategies: have we applied them in trauma patients at risk for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome?肺保护性通气策略:我们是否已将其应用于有急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险的创伤患者?
Am Surg. 2007 Apr;73(4):347-50.
4
What tidal volumes should be used in patients without acute lung injury?对于没有急性肺损伤的患者,应该使用多大的潮气量?
Anesthesiology. 2007 Jun;106(6):1226-31. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267607.25011.e8.
5
Ventilator or physician-induced lung injury?呼吸机所致肺损伤还是医源性肺损伤?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):255-8.
6
[A meta-analysis of clinical studies of low volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome].[急性呼吸窘迫综合征中低容量通气的临床研究的荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Feb 10;83(3):224-7.
7
Toward a better ventilation strategy for patients with acute lung injury.寻求针对急性肺损伤患者的更佳通气策略。
Crit Care. 2000;4(4):205-6. doi: 10.1186/cc695. Epub 2000 Jul 3.
8
Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury.与传统潮气量相比,采用较低潮气量对急性肺损伤进行通气。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 14;343(11):812-3; author reply 813-4.
9
Evidence-based management of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的循证管理
Respir Care. 2004 Jul;49(7):793-809.
10
Is permissive hypercapnia a beneficial strategy for pediatric acute lung injury?允许性高碳酸血症对小儿急性肺损伤是一种有益的策略吗?
Respir Care Clin N Am. 2006 Sep;12(3):371-87. doi: 10.1016/j.rcc.2006.06.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatric and Neonatal Patients.儿科和新生儿患者的机械通气
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 17;12:805620. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.805620. eCollection 2021.
2
Hyperoxia treatment of TREK-1/TREK-2/TRAAK-deficient mice is associated with a reduction in surfactant proteins.对TREK-1/TREK-2/TRAAK基因缺陷小鼠进行高氧治疗会导致表面活性蛋白减少。
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017 Dec 1;313(6):L1030-L1046. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00121.2017. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
3
Rationale for Prolonged Glucocorticoid Use in Pediatric ARDS: What the Adults Can Teach Us.
儿科急性呼吸窘迫综合征中糖皮质激素长期应用的理由:成人可从中获得的启示。
Front Pediatr. 2016 Jun 14;4:58. doi: 10.3389/fped.2016.00058. eCollection 2016.
4
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome.高频振荡通气与传统通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD004085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004085.pub4.
5
Optimal management of the critically ill: anaesthesia, monitoring, data capture, and point-of-care technological practices in ovine models of critical care.危重病患者的最佳治疗管理:在绵羊重症监护模型中进行的麻醉、监测、数据采集和即时护理技术实践。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:468309. doi: 10.1155/2014/468309. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
6
Pediatric Sepsis - Part I: "Children are not small adults!".小儿脓毒症 - 第一部分:“儿童并非缩小版成人!”
Open Inflamm J. 2011 Oct 7;4:4-15. doi: 10.2174/1875041901104010004.
7
Management of acute lung injury/ARDS.急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征的管理
Indian J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;77(11):1296-302. doi: 10.1007/s12098-010-0169-z. Epub 2010 Sep 4.
8
Predictors of outcome for children requiring respiratory extra-corporeal life support: implications for inclusion and exclusion criteria.需要呼吸体外生命支持的儿童的预后预测因素:对纳入和排除标准的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Dec;34(12):2256-63. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1232-3. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
9
Pediatric intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: a new challenge for the pediatric intensivist.小儿肠道和多脏器移植:小儿重症监护医生面临的新挑战。
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Sep;34(9):1570-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1141-5. Epub 2008 May 24.