Laing Peter, Bacon Andrew, McCormack Brenda, Gregoriadis Gregory, Frisch Benoît, Schuber Francis
Lipoxen Plc, London BioScience Innovation Centre, London, NW1 0NH, UK.
J Liposome Res. 2006;16(3):229-35. doi: 10.1080/08982100600880432.
DNA vaccination with mammalian-expressible plasmid DNA encoding protein antigens is known to be an effective means to elicit cell-mediated immunity, sometimes in the absence of a significant antibody response. This may be contrasted with protein vaccination, which gives rise to antibody responses with little evidence of cell-mediated immunity. This has led to considerable interest in DNA vaccination as a means to elicit cell-mediated immune responses against conserved viral antigens or intracellular cancer antigens, for the purpose of therapeutic vaccination. However, almost all current vaccines are used prophylactically and work by producing antibodies rather than cell mediated immune responses. In the present study we have therefore explored the combination of DNA and protein forms of an antigen using two exemplary prophylactic vaccine antigens, namely inactivated influenza virion and hepatitis-B surface antigen. We studied the effects of various combinations of DNA and protein on the antibody response. Co-administration of soluble forms of DNA and protein representations of the same antigen gave rise to the same level of antibody response as if protein were administered alone. In contrast, we found that when these antigens are entrapped in the same liposomal compartment, that there was a strong synergistic effect on the immune response, which was much greater than when either antigen was administered alone, or in various other modes of combination (e.g. co-administration as free entities, also pooled liposomal formulations where the two materials were contained in separate liposomal vehicles in the same suspension). The synergistic effect of liposomally co-entrapped DNA and protein exceeded, markedly, the well known adjuvant effects of plasmid DNA and liposomes. We have termed this new approach to vaccination 'co-delivery' and suggest that it may derive from the simultaneous presentation of antigen via MHC class-I (DNA) and MHC class-II (protein) pathways to CD8+ and CD4+ cells at the same antigen presenting cell--a mode of presentation that would commonly occur with live viral pathogens. We conclude that co-delivery is a very effective means to generate protective antibody responses against viral pathogens.
用编码蛋白抗原的哺乳动物可表达质粒DNA进行DNA疫苗接种是引发细胞介导免疫的有效手段,有时在没有显著抗体反应的情况下也能实现。这与蛋白质疫苗接种形成对比,蛋白质疫苗接种会引发抗体反应,但几乎没有细胞介导免疫的证据。这使得人们对DNA疫苗接种产生了浓厚兴趣,将其作为引发针对保守病毒抗原或细胞内癌症抗原的细胞介导免疫反应的一种手段,用于治疗性疫苗接种。然而,几乎所有当前的疫苗都是预防性使用的,通过产生抗体而不是细胞介导免疫反应来发挥作用。因此,在本研究中,我们使用两种示例性预防性疫苗抗原,即灭活流感病毒粒子和乙肝表面抗原,探索了抗原的DNA和蛋白质形式的组合。我们研究了DNA和蛋白质的各种组合对抗体反应的影响。将相同抗原的可溶性DNA形式和蛋白质形式共同给药,产生的抗体反应水平与单独给予蛋白质时相同。相比之下,我们发现当这些抗原被包裹在同一脂质体隔室内时,对免疫反应有强烈的协同作用,这比单独给予任何一种抗原或以各种其他组合方式(例如作为游离实体共同给药,也包括将两种物质包含在同一悬浮液中单独脂质体载体中的混合脂质体制剂)给药时要大得多。脂质体共同包裹的DNA和蛋白质的协同作用明显超过了质粒DNA和脂质体众所周知的佐剂作用。我们将这种新的疫苗接种方法称为“共同递送”,并认为它可能源于通过MHC I类(DNA)和MHC II类(蛋白质)途径在同一抗原呈递细胞上同时将抗原呈递给CD8 +和CD4 +细胞——这种呈递方式通常会在活病毒病原体中出现。我们得出结论,共同递送是产生针对病毒病原体的保护性抗体反应的非常有效的手段。