Suppr超能文献

普遍预防干预措施对青少年甲基苯丙胺使用的长期影响。

Long-term effects of universal preventive interventions on methamphetamine use among adolescents.

作者信息

Spoth Richard L, Clair Scott, Shin Chungyeol, Redmond Cleve

机构信息

Partnerships in Prevention Science Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Sep;160(9):876-82. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.9.876.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the long-term effects of universal preventive interventions on methamphetamine use by adolescents in the general population during their late high school years.

DESIGN

Two randomized, controlled prevention trials.

SETTING

Public schools in the Midwest from 1993 to 2004.

PARTICIPANTS

Study 1 began with 667 sixth grade students from 33 rural public schools; the follow-up included 457 students. Study 2 began with 679 seventh grade students from 36 rural public schools; the follow-up assessment included 597 students.

INTERVENTIONS

In study 1, schools were assigned to the Iowa Strengthening Families Program (ISFP), Preparing for the Drug Free Years, or a control condition. In study 2, schools were assigned to a revised ISFP (SFP 10-14) plus Life Skills Training (SPF 10-14 + LST), LST alone, or a control condition.

RESULTS

Self-reports of lifetime and past-year methamphetamine use were collected at 6(1/2) years past baseline (study 1) and at 4(1/2) and 5(1/2) years past baseline (study 2). In study 1, the ISFP past-year rate was 0.0% compared with 3.2% in the control condition (P = .04). In study 2, SFP 10-14 + LST showed significant effects on lifetime and past-year use at the 4(1/2) year follow-up (eg, 0.5% lifetime use in the intervention condition vs 5.2% in the control condition, P = .006); both SFP 10-14 + LST and LST alone had significant lifetime use effects at the 5(1/2) year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Brief universal interventions have potential for public health impact by reducing methamphetamine use among adolescents.

摘要

目的

研究通用预防性干预措施对普通人群中青少年在高中后期使用甲基苯丙胺的长期影响。

设计

两项随机对照预防试验。

地点

1993年至2004年美国中西部的公立学校。

参与者

研究1始于来自33所农村公立学校的667名六年级学生;随访对象包括457名学生。研究2始于来自36所农村公立学校的679名七年级学生;随访评估对象包括597名学生。

干预措施

在研究1中,学校被分配到爱荷华加强家庭计划(ISFP)、“为无毒品岁月做准备”项目或对照组。在研究2中,学校被分配到修订后的ISFP(SFP 10 - 14)加生活技能培训(SPF 10 - 14 + LST)、仅生活技能培训(LST)或对照组。

结果

在基线后6.5年(研究1)以及基线后4.5年和5.5年(研究2)收集了终生和过去一年使用甲基苯丙胺的自我报告。在研究1中,ISFP过去一年的使用率为0.0%,而对照组为3.2%(P = 0.04)。在研究2中,SFP 10 - 14 + LST在4.5年随访时对终生和过去一年的使用显示出显著效果(例如,干预组终生使用率为0.5%,对照组为5.2%,P = 0.006);在5.5年随访时,SFP 10 - 14 + LST和仅LST对终生使用均有显著效果。

结论

简短的通用干预措施通过减少青少年甲基苯丙胺使用量对公众健康具有潜在影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验