• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于伙伴关系的家庭-学校预防干预措施在基线后5.5年的物质使用结果。

Substance use outcomes 51/2 years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions.

作者信息

Spoth Richard L, Randall G Kevin, Trudeau Linda, Shin Chungyeol, Redmond Cleve

机构信息

Partnerships in Prevention Science Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010 USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jul 1;96(1-2):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.023. Epub 2008 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.023
PMID:18434045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2848484/
Abstract

This article reports adolescent substance use outcomes of universal family and school preventive interventions 5(1/2) years past baseline. Participants were 1677 7th grade students from schools (N=36) randomly assigned to the school-based Life Skills Training plus the Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 (LST+SFP 10-14), LST-alone, or a control condition. Self-reports were collected at baseline, 6 months later following the interventions, then yearly through the 12th grade. Measures included initiation-alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, and drunkenness, along with a Substance Initiation Index (SII)-and measures of more serious use-frequency of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use, drunkenness frequency, monthly poly-substance use, and advanced poly-substance use. Analyses ruled out differential attrition. For all substance initiation outcomes, one or both intervention groups showed significant, positive point-in-time differences at 12th grade and/or significant growth trajectory outcomes when compared with the control group. Although no main effects for the more serious substance use outcomes were observed, a higher-risk subsample demonstrated significant, positive 12th grade point-in-time and/or growth trajectory outcomes for one or both intervention groups on all measures. The observed pattern of results likely reflects a combination of predispositions of the higher-risk subsample, the timing of the interventions, and baseline differences between experimental conditions favoring the control group.

摘要

本文报告了从基线起5年半后,针对家庭和学校的普遍性预防干预措施在青少年物质使用方面的成效。研究参与者为来自36所学校的1677名七年级学生,这些学生被随机分配至校本生活技能培训加上“强化家庭计划:针对10 - 14岁家长和青少年”(LST + SFP 10 - 14)组、单独的LST组或对照组。在基线期、干预措施实施6个月后收集自我报告,随后每年收集直至12年级。测量指标包括酒精、香烟、大麻的初次使用以及醉酒情况,还有一个物质使用起始指数(SII),以及更严重使用情况的测量指标——酒精、香烟和大麻使用频率、醉酒频率、每月多种物质使用情况以及进阶多种物质使用情况。分析排除了差异损耗。对于所有物质使用起始结果,与对照组相比,一个或两个干预组在12年级时均显示出显著的、积极的即时差异和/或显著的增长轨迹结果。虽然在更严重的物质使用结果方面未观察到主效应,但一个高风险子样本显示,一个或两个干预组在所有测量指标上,在12年级时均有显著的、积极的即时结果和/或增长轨迹结果。观察到的结果模式可能反映了高风险子样本的易感性、干预措施的时机以及有利于对照组的实验条件之间的基线差异的综合作用。

相似文献

1
Substance use outcomes 51/2 years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions.基于伙伴关系的家庭-学校预防干预措施在基线后5.5年的物质使用结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jul 1;96(1-2):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.023. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
2
Replicating and extending a model of effects of universal preventive intervention during early adolescence on young adult substance misuse.复制并扩展一项关于青少年早期普遍预防干预对青年期物质滥用影响的模型。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Oct;84(10):913-21. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000131. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
3
Replication RCT of early universal prevention effects on young adult substance misuse.早期全面预防对青年成人物质滥用影响的重复随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;82(6):949-63. doi: 10.1037/a0036840. Epub 2014 May 12.
4
Longitudinal substance initiation outcomes for a universal preventive intervention combining family and school programs.一项结合家庭和学校项目的通用预防干预措施的纵向物质使用起始结果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2002 Jun;16(2):129-34.
5
Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.针对年轻人多种风险行为的个人、家庭和学校层面的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 5;10(10):CD009927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009927.pub2.
6
Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population.一项针对白人中产阶级人群的药物滥用预防随机试验的长期随访结果。
JAMA. 1995 Apr 12;273(14):1106-12.
7
Effectiveness of a pragmatic school-based universal resilience intervention in reducing tobacco, alcohol and illicit substance use in a population of adolescents: cluster-randomised controlled trial.一项基于学校的实用普遍抗逆力干预措施在减少青少年群体烟草、酒精和非法药物使用方面的效果:整群随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e016060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016060.
8
Alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco use among Canadian youth: do we need more multi-substance prevention programming?加拿大青少年中的酒精、大麻和烟草使用情况:我们是否需要更多的多物质预防项目?
J Prim Prev. 2010 Jun;31(3):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s10935-010-0211-y.
9
Effect of Middle School Interventions on Alcohol Misuse and Abuse in Mexican American High School Adolescents: Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.中学干预对墨西哥裔美国高中生酒精滥用的影响:一项随机临床试验的五年随访。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 May 1;75(5):429-437. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0058.
10
Substance-use outcomes at 18 months past baseline: the PROSPER Community-University Partnership Trial.基线后18个月的物质使用结果:PROSPER社区-大学合作试验
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Fadeout and persistence of intervention impacts on social-emotional and cognitive skills in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.干预对儿童和青少年社会情感和认知技能的影响的淡出和持续:随机对照试验的荟萃分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Oct;150(10):1207-1236. doi: 10.1037/bul0000450.
2
Using qualitative comparative analysis to uncover multiple pathways to program sustainment: implications for community-based youth substance misuse prevention.运用定性比较分析揭示项目持续开展的多种途径:对基于社区的青少年药物滥用预防工作的启示
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 May 26;3(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00303-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A home-based prevention program for sixth-grade alcohol use: Results from project Northland.一项针对六年级学生饮酒问题的家庭预防项目:北国项目的结果。
J Prim Prev. 1995 Dec;16(2):125-47. doi: 10.1007/BF02407336.
2
PROSPER STUDY OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTION IMPLEMENTATION QUALITY BY COMMUNITY-UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIPS.社区-大学合作开展的基于证据的干预实施质量的繁荣研究。
J Community Psychol. 2007 Oct 25;35(8):981-999. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20207.
3
Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions: maintenance of community-based partnership recruitment results and associated factors.
Cannabis Policy Changes and Adolescent Cannabis Use: Evidence from Europe.
大麻政策变化与青少年大麻使用:来自欧洲的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):5174. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105174.
4
Does a mindfulness-augmented version of the German Strengthening Families Program reduce substance use in adolescents? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.正念增强版德国强化家庭项目是否能减少青少年的物质使用?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jan 28;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4065-1.
5
Authoritative Parenting Behaviors and Marijuana Use Based on Age Among a National Sample of Hispanic Adolescents.权威型教养行为与基于年龄的西班牙裔青少年大麻使用。
J Prim Prev. 2020 Feb;41(1):51-69. doi: 10.1007/s10935-019-00576-x.
6
Families and Schools Together (FAST) for improving outcomes for children and their families.家庭与学校携手共进(FAST),以改善儿童及其家庭的状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 31;7(7):CD012760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012760.pub2.
7
Family-based prevention programmes for alcohol use in young people.针对年轻人饮酒问题的家庭预防计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 19;3(3):CD012287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012287.pub2.
8
Identifying Links Between Sexual Violence and Youth Violence Perpetration: New Opportunities for Sexual Violence Prevention.识别性暴力与青少年暴力犯罪之间的联系:预防性暴力的新机遇。
Psychol Violence. 2013 Apr;3(2):140-150. doi: 10.1037/a0029084.
9
Effect of Middle School Interventions on Alcohol Misuse and Abuse in Mexican American High School Adolescents: Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.中学干预对墨西哥裔美国高中生酒精滥用的影响:一项随机临床试验的五年随访。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 May 1;75(5):429-437. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0058.
10
Valuing Our Communities: Ethical Considerations for Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Prevention.重视我们的社区:基于社区的预防措施经济评估的伦理考量。
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Dec;60(3-4):309-315. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12200. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
迈向基于证据的家庭干预措施的传播:社区伙伴关系招募结果的维持及相关因素
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Jun;21(2):137-46. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.137.
4
The predictors and consequences of adolescent amphetamine use: findings from the Victoria Adolescent Health Cohort Study.青少年使用安非他明的预测因素及后果:来自维多利亚青少年健康队列研究的结果。
Addiction. 2007 Jul;102(7):1076-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01839.x.
5
Concurrent and simultaneous drug and alcohol use: results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey.药物与酒精的同时使用:2000年全国酒精调查结果
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Sep 6;90(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.024. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
6
Evidence for significant polydrug use among ecstasy-using college students.使用摇头丸的大学生中存在大量多药滥用现象的证据。
J Am Coll Health. 2006 Sep-Oct;55(2):99-104. doi: 10.3200/JACH.55.2.99-104.
7
Long-term effects of universal preventive interventions on methamphetamine use among adolescents.普遍预防干预措施对青少年甲基苯丙胺使用的长期影响。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Sep;160(9):876-82. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.9.876.
8
Simultaneous and concurrent polydrug use of alcohol and prescription drugs: prevalence, correlates, and consequences.酒精与处方药同时及并发的多药滥用:患病率、相关因素及后果。
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Jul;67(4):529-37. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.529.
9
Cannabis use and other illicit drug use: testing the cannabis gateway hypothesis.大麻使用与其他非法药物使用:检验大麻网关假说
Addiction. 2006 Apr;101(4):556-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01322.x.
10
Randomized study of combined universal family and school preventive interventions: patterns of long-term effects on initiation, regular use, and weekly drunkenness.家庭与学校联合预防性综合干预措施的随机研究:对饮酒起始、规律饮酒及每周醉酒情况的长期影响模式
Psychol Addict Behav. 2005 Dec;19(4):372-81. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.372.