Spoth Richard L, Randall G Kevin, Trudeau Linda, Shin Chungyeol, Redmond Cleve
Partnerships in Prevention Science Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010 USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jul 1;96(1-2):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.023. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
This article reports adolescent substance use outcomes of universal family and school preventive interventions 5(1/2) years past baseline. Participants were 1677 7th grade students from schools (N=36) randomly assigned to the school-based Life Skills Training plus the Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 (LST+SFP 10-14), LST-alone, or a control condition. Self-reports were collected at baseline, 6 months later following the interventions, then yearly through the 12th grade. Measures included initiation-alcohol, cigarette, marijuana, and drunkenness, along with a Substance Initiation Index (SII)-and measures of more serious use-frequency of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use, drunkenness frequency, monthly poly-substance use, and advanced poly-substance use. Analyses ruled out differential attrition. For all substance initiation outcomes, one or both intervention groups showed significant, positive point-in-time differences at 12th grade and/or significant growth trajectory outcomes when compared with the control group. Although no main effects for the more serious substance use outcomes were observed, a higher-risk subsample demonstrated significant, positive 12th grade point-in-time and/or growth trajectory outcomes for one or both intervention groups on all measures. The observed pattern of results likely reflects a combination of predispositions of the higher-risk subsample, the timing of the interventions, and baseline differences between experimental conditions favoring the control group.
本文报告了从基线起5年半后,针对家庭和学校的普遍性预防干预措施在青少年物质使用方面的成效。研究参与者为来自36所学校的1677名七年级学生,这些学生被随机分配至校本生活技能培训加上“强化家庭计划:针对10 - 14岁家长和青少年”(LST + SFP 10 - 14)组、单独的LST组或对照组。在基线期、干预措施实施6个月后收集自我报告,随后每年收集直至12年级。测量指标包括酒精、香烟、大麻的初次使用以及醉酒情况,还有一个物质使用起始指数(SII),以及更严重使用情况的测量指标——酒精、香烟和大麻使用频率、醉酒频率、每月多种物质使用情况以及进阶多种物质使用情况。分析排除了差异损耗。对于所有物质使用起始结果,与对照组相比,一个或两个干预组在12年级时均显示出显著的、积极的即时差异和/或显著的增长轨迹结果。虽然在更严重的物质使用结果方面未观察到主效应,但一个高风险子样本显示,一个或两个干预组在所有测量指标上,在12年级时均有显著的、积极的即时结果和/或增长轨迹结果。观察到的结果模式可能反映了高风险子样本的易感性、干预措施的时机以及有利于对照组的实验条件之间的基线差异的综合作用。