Mueller X, Sadeghi H, Kappenberger L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Jun;13(6):711-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb02095.x.
To compare the complication rate in patients having a dual chamber versus a single chamber pacing system, 337 consecutive procedures performed during a 3-year period were analyzed prospectively. Two hundred fifty-eight patients (77%) received a VVI pacemaker and 75 (23%) a DDD unit. Thirteen VVI (5%) and 4 DDD (5.3%) needed reintervention. Lead displacement with reoperation was required for three ventricular leads (1%) and one atrial lead (1.3%). Infection occurred in two VVI units (0.77%) and one DDD (1.33%) unit. Muscular stimulation was noticed among three DDD (4%) and nine VVI systems (3.5%). Urgent reprogramming was needed for 23 VVI (9%) and six DDD units (8%). There was no increase in complications with dual chamber pacing compared to single chamber systems.
为比较双腔起搏系统与单腔起搏系统患者的并发症发生率,我们对3年期间连续进行的337例手术进行了前瞻性分析。258例患者(77%)接受了VVI起搏器,75例(23%)接受了DDD起搏器。13例VVI患者(5%)和4例DDD患者(5.3%)需要再次干预。三根心室导线(1%)和一根心房导线(1.3%)需要因导线移位而再次手术。2例VVI起搏器(0.77%)和1例DDD起搏器(1.33%)发生感染。在3例DDD系统(4%)和9例VVI系统(3.5%)中发现肌肉刺激。23例VVI患者(9%)和6例DDD患者(8%)需要紧急重新编程。与单腔系统相比,双腔起搏的并发症没有增加。