Schattenberg Jörn M, Galle Peter R, Schuchmann Marcus
I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Germany.
Liver Int. 2006 Oct;26(8):904-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2006.01324.x.
The description of the morphological hallmarks of programmed cell death, apoptosis, in 1972 by Kerr, Wyllie and Currie started a field of research that revolutionized our understanding of cellular proliferation, tissue homeostasis and pathophysiology of many diseases. In the following years, a series of proteins involved in signaling and intracellular death pathways were identified and 30 years later the Noble Prize for physiology and medicine was awarded to S. Brenner, H. R. Horvitz and J. E. Sulston for their discoveries related to describing the mechanisms of cell death (apoptosis). The delineation of the signaling pathways that mediate apoptosis changed the paradigms of understanding in many liver diseases. The most detailed analyzed mode of apoptosis involves a cell surface-based receptor-ligand system. Death receptors are typically members of the tumor necrosis factor-receptor superfamily and comprise an intracellular death domain. Following ligand binding to the receptor, intracellular adapter molecules are recruited to the receptor and subsequently transmit the apoptotic signal. Intracellular organelle-dependent signaling occurs, and effector molecules then augment the receptor-initiated apoptosis process. Cell death and degradation follows the activation of a highly regulated set of cytosolic and nuclear proteases and DNAses. Receptor-independent activation of the apoptotic process can occur as part of the cytotoxicity related to UV radiation, chemotherapeuticals or other DNA-damaging agents through activation of intracellular sensors of cellular integrity, e.g. the tumor suppressor gene p53. In contrast to necrosis, apoptosis is not commonly accompanied by an inflammatory response that causes collateral cell damage. The apoptotic program is highly effective in eliciting cell death and thus must be tightly controlled. This is achieved through continuous integration of pro- and antiapoptotic signals at the individual cell level. Dysregulation of the apoptotic process, resulting in too much or too little cell death, has potentially devastating effects and has been implicated in many forms of liver disease like acute liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma. This review will focus initially on recent progress in signaling events of hepatocellular apoptosis and subsequently discuss the consequences for the hepatic pathophysiology that involves disarrangement of hepatocellular apoptosis.
1972年,克尔、威利和柯里对程序性细胞死亡(即凋亡)的形态学特征进行了描述,开启了一个研究领域,彻底改变了我们对细胞增殖、组织稳态以及许多疾病病理生理学的理解。在随后的几年里,一系列参与信号传导和细胞内死亡途径的蛋白质被鉴定出来,30年后,诺贝尔生理学和医学奖授予了S. 布伦纳、H. R. 霍维茨和J. E. 萨尔斯顿,以表彰他们在描述细胞死亡(凋亡)机制方面的发现。介导凋亡的信号通路的阐明改变了许多肝脏疾病的理解范式。凋亡最详细分析的模式涉及基于细胞表面的受体 - 配体系统。死亡受体通常是肿瘤坏死因子受体超家族的成员,包含一个细胞内死亡结构域。配体与受体结合后,细胞内衔接分子被招募到受体,随后传递凋亡信号。发生细胞内细胞器依赖性信号传导,效应分子随后增强受体启动的凋亡过程。细胞死亡和降解遵循一组高度调节的胞质和核蛋白酶及DNA酶的激活。凋亡过程的非受体依赖性激活可作为与紫外线辐射、化疗药物或其他DNA损伤剂相关的细胞毒性的一部分,通过激活细胞完整性的细胞内传感器,如肿瘤抑制基因p53来发生。与坏死不同,凋亡通常不会伴随引起附带细胞损伤的炎症反应。凋亡程序在引发细胞死亡方面非常有效,因此必须受到严格控制。这是通过在单个细胞水平上持续整合促凋亡和抗凋亡信号来实现的。凋亡过程的失调,导致细胞死亡过多或过少,具有潜在的毁灭性影响,并与许多形式的肝脏疾病如急性肝衰竭或肝细胞癌有关。本综述将首先关注肝细胞凋亡信号事件的最新进展,随后讨论涉及肝细胞凋亡紊乱的肝脏病理生理学后果。