Fowler Mark I, Yin Kiave Y Ho Wang, Humphries Holly E, Heckels John E, Christodoulides Myron
Molecular Microbiology Group, Division of Infection, Inflammation and Repair, Mailpoint 814, University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Infect Immun. 2006 Nov;74(11):6467-78. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00644-06. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
The rationale for the present study was to determine how different species of bacteria interact with cells of the human meninges in order to gain information that would have broad relevance to understanding aspects of the innate immune response in the brain. Neisseria lactamica is an occasional cause of meningitis in humans, and in this study we investigated the in vitro interactions between N. lactamica and cells derived from the leptomeninges in comparison with the closely related organism Neisseria meningitidis, a major cause of meningitis worldwide. N. lactamica adhered specifically to meningioma cells, but the levels of adherence were generally lower than those with N. meningitidis. Meningioma cells challenged with N. lactamica and N. meningitidis secreted significant amounts of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), the C-X-C chemokine IL-8, and the C-C chemokines monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and RANTES, but it secreted very low levels of the cytokine growth factor granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Thus, meningeal cells are involved in the innate host response to Neisseria species that are capable of entering the cerebrospinal fluid. The levels of IL-8 and MCP-1 secretion induced by both bacteria were essentially similar. By contrast, N. lactamica induced significantly lower levels of IL-6 than N. meningitidis. Challenge with the highest concentration of N. lactamica (10(8) CFU) induced a small but significant down-regulation of RANTES secretion, which was not observed with lower concentrations of bacteria. N. meningitidis (10(6) to 10(8) CFU) also down-regulated RANTES secretion, but this effect was significantly greater than that observed with N. lactamica. Although both bacteria were unable to invade meningeal cells directly, host cells remained viable on prolonged challenge with N. lactamica, whereas N. meningitidis induced death; the mechanism was overwhelming necrosis with no significant apoptosis. It is likely that differential expression of modulins between N. lactamica and N. meningitidis contributes to these observed differences in pathogenic potential.
本研究的目的是确定不同种类的细菌如何与人类脑膜细胞相互作用,以便获取与理解大脑先天性免疫反应各方面具有广泛相关性的信息。乳酸奈瑟菌是人类脑膜炎的偶发病因,在本研究中,我们调查了乳酸奈瑟菌与软脑膜来源的细胞之间的体外相互作用,并与密切相关的脑膜炎奈瑟菌进行比较,后者是全球范围内脑膜炎的主要病因。乳酸奈瑟菌特异性黏附于脑膜瘤细胞,但其黏附水平通常低于脑膜炎奈瑟菌。用乳酸奈瑟菌和脑膜炎奈瑟菌刺激的脑膜瘤细胞分泌大量促炎细胞因子白细胞介素 -6(IL -6)、C -X -C趋化因子IL -8以及C -C趋化因子单核细胞趋化蛋白1(MCP -1)和调节激活正常T细胞表达和分泌因子(RANTES),但分泌的细胞因子生长因子粒细胞 -巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM -CSF)水平极低。因此,脑膜细胞参与了对能够进入脑脊液的奈瑟菌属的先天性宿主反应。两种细菌诱导的IL -8和MCP -1分泌水平基本相似。相比之下,乳酸奈瑟菌诱导的IL -6水平明显低于脑膜炎奈瑟菌。用最高浓度(10⁸CFU)的乳酸奈瑟菌刺激会导致RANTES分泌出现轻微但显著的下调,较低浓度的细菌刺激则未观察到这种现象。脑膜炎奈瑟菌(10⁶至10⁸CFU)也会下调RANTES分泌,但这种效应明显大于乳酸奈瑟菌。虽然两种细菌都不能直接侵袭脑膜细胞,但长时间用乳酸奈瑟菌刺激后宿主细胞仍保持存活,而脑膜炎奈瑟菌则会导致细胞死亡;其机制是压倒性坏死,无明显凋亡。乳酸奈瑟菌和脑膜炎奈瑟菌之间调节素的差异表达可能导致了这些观察到的致病潜力差异。