Kamphues J, Schulz A J
Institut für Tierernährung der Tierärztlichen Hochschule Hannover.
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2006 Aug;113(8):298-303.
Dioxins represent a group of undesired substances that may contaminate feedstuffs. Due to their persistency in the environment it can be expected that feed contamination by dioxins will occur in the future, too. Therefore efforts in agriculture and in the feed industry have to be focussed on measures that minimize the dioxin contamination of feedstuffs, especially under the aspects of food safety. Several dioxin scandals in the past have contributed to a higher awareness in feed production as well as on the side of food consumers and administration resulting in changes of feed legislation (implementation of maximum levels of dioxins in feed and food). Some of the dioxin scandals enlarged the knowledge concerning the potential ways dioxins entering the food chain (for example dioxin contamination during the drying process of grass meal, recycling of contaminated oils, use of contaminated kaolinit a.s.o.). In difference to those accidents in feed producing agriculture there is a main influence of potential soil contamination on the dioxin contents in feedstuffs (like roughage). Producing roughage (green fodder, silage, hay) on areas with grass land by grazing animals can result in corresponding consumption of soil that contaminates the green fodder. Intending a lowest feed contamination by dioxins implies that the soil contamination is known. Depending on the rate of soil contamination farmers should decide on the kind of feed production and on the techniques of harvesting the fodder. For example it is possible to produce maize (whole plant in high cut technique) without higher dioxin contents in maize silage, on the other hand it can not be recommended to use contaminated fields for growing beets or by grazing ruminants, pigs or poultry (outdoor systems). In general during the harvesting process technical measures have to be chosen that reduce/minimize the soil contamination because the dioxin concentration in the soil of exposed areas is much more higher than the dioxin concentration within the feedstuffs. The high costs of dioxin analyses limit an implementation of a monitoring program including samples of soil and feedstuffs of each feed producing unit or individual farms. Therefore it is necessary to focus the monitoring efforts on areas and samples that let expect a higher risk of dioxin contamination. New screening tests should be developed and implemented that allow a higher frequency and density of control measures concerning dioxin. In the case of suspicious findings only those samples could be analysed by the classic chemical procedure (time consuming, high costs). Especially in cases of food contamination (for example detected in monitoring programs of the food industry) it is necessary to find out the way and cause, not neglecting the potential role of the contaminated soil. Last but not least it is recommended to inform the public continuously about levels of dioxins that are actually found in food as well as in feed (and soils), especially on behalf of the consumers confidence in food and feed control and its related administration. Continuous information will increase the consumers understanding that there is (and will be for further years) a background contamination of feed and food in general (that decreased markedly in the last decades), and that cases of detected higher dioxin levels are exceptional findings that result immediately in efforts of the food and feed industry to obstruct the way that enabled an entering to the food chain.
二噁英是一类可能污染饲料的不良物质。由于它们在环境中具有持久性,可以预计未来饲料仍会受到二噁英污染。因此,农业和饲料行业必须致力于采取措施,尽量减少饲料中二噁英的污染,特别是从食品安全的角度出发。过去发生的几起二噁英丑闻提高了饲料生产方、食品消费者和管理部门的认识,导致饲料法规发生变化(实施饲料和食品中二噁英的最高限量)。一些二噁英丑闻扩大了人们对二噁英进入食物链潜在途径的认识(例如,草粉干燥过程中的二噁英污染、受污染油脂的回收利用、使用受污染的高岭土等)。与饲料生产农业中的那些事故不同,潜在的土壤污染对饲料(如粗饲料)中的二噁英含量有主要影响。通过放牧动物在草地地区生产粗饲料(青饲料、青贮饲料、干草)会导致相应的土壤摄入,从而污染青饲料。要想使饲料中二噁英污染降至最低,就意味着要了解土壤污染情况。农民应根据土壤污染程度决定饲料生产种类和饲料收获技术。例如,采用高割技术生产整株玉米时,青贮玉米中的二噁英含量不会升高;另一方面,不建议在受污染的土地上种植甜菜,也不建议用受污染的土地放牧反刍动物、猪或家禽(户外养殖系统)。一般来说,在收获过程中必须选择能减少/最小化土壤污染的技术措施,因为暴露地区土壤中的二噁英浓度远高于饲料中的二噁英浓度。二噁英分析成本高昂,限制了对每个饲料生产单位或个体农场的土壤和饲料样本进行监测计划的实施。因此,有必要将监测工作重点放在预计二噁英污染风险较高的地区和样本上。应开发并实施新的筛选测试,以便能更频繁、更密集地对二噁英进行控制措施。对于可疑结果,只有那些样本才能采用经典化学程序进行分析(耗时、成本高)。特别是在食品污染的情况下(例如在食品行业监测计划中检测到),有必要查明污染途径和原因,不能忽视受污染土壤的潜在作用。最后但同样重要的是,建议持续向公众通报食品、饲料(以及土壤)中实际检测到的二噁英水平,特别是为了增强消费者对食品和饲料监管及其相关管理部门的信心。持续的信息通报将增进消费者的理解,即饲料和食品总体上存在(并且在未来几年仍会存在)背景污染(在过去几十年中已显著下降),而检测到二噁英水平较高的情况是例外发现,食品和饲料行业会立即采取措施阻断其进入食物链的途径。