Hájek Z, Srp B, Pavlíková M, Zvárová J, Liska K, El-Haddad R, Pasková A, Parízek A
Gynecological-Obstetrical Clinic, 1st Medical faculty, Charles University and general Teaching Hospital, Prague.
Ceska Gynekol. 2006 Jul;71(4):263-7.
To evaluated sensitivity and specificity of presently used methods for intrapartal monitoring (CTG, FpO2 a STAN S-21) and their mutual comparison.
A prospective study.
Gynecological-Obstetrical Clinic, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and general Teaching Hospital, Prague.
In 114 pregnant women with high-risk or pathological course of pregnancy the authors evaluated the capability of individual methods to predict intrapartal hypoxia, determined on the basis of postnatal evaluation of parameters observed (Apgar score in 1st minute, pH from umbilical artery, lactate levels in fetal blood, base excess (BE) and postpartum condition of fetus evaluated by a neonatologist). Each method was categorized according to its importance. The quality of individual methods was evaluated by means of their sensitivity and specificity as well as by the area under ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic), i.e. AUC (Area under Curve). A similar or different prediction of the condition of the newborn by these individual methods was evaluated by the McNamara test of symmetry. In 50 deliveries performed by Cesarean section and 24 forceps deliveries the authors evaluated postnatal pH from umbilical artery and evaluation by Chi-square test. The women in childbed were infused with a tocolytic drug (hexoprenalin) before Cesarean section. All tests were performed at 5% level of significance.
Low level of Apgar score in the 1st minute and less) always indicated CTG, but also a large proportion of normal newborns. STAN, in contrast, well indicates all newborns with a normal point evaluation. The best balanced evaluation of the newborns is provided by FpO2 and there was a significant difference between CTG and FpO2. In evaluating pH from the umbilical artery (pH < 7.20), TCG proved to be most sensitive again but displayed low specificity. STAN was the best predictor of newborns with normal pH. In evaluating high levels of lactate (> 3.7mmol/L) and BE (> -10) and related demonstration of metabolic acidosis STAN proved to be the best predictor. The condition of the newborn evaluated by a neonatologist immediately after birth (medium or heavy depression) was best predicted by FpO2. In deliveries performed by Cesarean section and after the administration of tocolysis the postnatal pH was higher then in forceps deliveries without acute tocolysis. The occurrence of emergencies in the course of a pathological delivery in individual methods is as follows: CTG, FpO2 and STAN.
Even though CTG displays a very low specificity, this method should not be rejected, since it draws attention of the obstetrician very early to the possibility of developing hypoxia. FpO2 or STAN gives more precision to the situation and demarcates a correct moment for ending the delivery for the indication of fetus hypoxia intra partum. STAN is the best predictor for conditions of developing metabolic acidosis, evaluated postnatally by the level of lactate and BE in fetal blood.
评估目前用于产时监测的方法(CTG、FpO2和STAN S - 21)的敏感性和特异性,并进行相互比较。
前瞻性研究。
布拉格查理大学第一医学院妇产科诊所及综合教学医院。
在114例高危或妊娠过程异常的孕妇中,作者评估了各种方法预测产时缺氧的能力,产时缺氧是根据产后对观察到的参数进行评估确定的(1分钟时的阿氏评分、脐动脉pH值、胎儿血乳酸水平、碱剩余(BE)以及新生儿科医生评估的胎儿产后状况)。每种方法根据其重要性进行分类。通过敏感性、特异性以及ROC曲线下面积(即AUC)来评估各种方法的质量。通过McNamara对称性检验评估这些方法对新生儿状况的相似或不同预测。在50例剖宫产和24例产钳助产分娩中,作者评估了脐动脉产后pH值,并进行卡方检验。剖宫产术前给产褥期妇女输注了一种宫缩抑制剂(海索那林)。所有检验均在5%的显著性水平下进行。
1分钟时阿氏评分低(及更低)总是提示CTG,但也提示很大比例的正常新生儿。相比之下,STAN能很好地提示所有评估结果正常的新生儿。FpO2对新生儿的评估最为平衡,CTG和FpO2之间存在显著差异。在评估脐动脉pH值(pH < 7.20)时,TCG再次被证明最敏感,但特异性较低。STAN是新生儿pH值正常的最佳预测指标。在评估高乳酸水平(> 3.7mmol/L)和BE(> - 10)以及相关的代谢性酸中毒表现时,STAN被证明是最佳预测指标。出生后立即由新生儿科医生评估的新生儿状况(中度或重度抑制),FpO2的预测效果最佳。剖宫产及使用宫缩抑制剂后分娩的产后pH值高于未进行急性宫缩抑制的产钳助产分娩。各种方法在病理性分娩过程中紧急情况的发生率如下:CTG、FpO2和STAN。
尽管CTG的特异性非常低,但该方法不应被摒弃,因为它能很早就引起产科医生对缺氧发生可能性的关注。FpO2或STAN能更精确地反映情况,并为因产时胎儿缺氧指征而结束分娩划定正确时机。STAN是根据胎儿血乳酸水平和BE产后评估代谢性酸中毒发生情况的最佳预测指标。