Biringer K, Danko J, Zúbor P, Mat'asová K, Zibolen M, Pullmann R
Gynekologicko-pôrodnicka klinika JLF UK a UNM, Martin.
Ceska Gynekol. 2011 Jun;76(3):222-9.
To evaluate validity of biophysical diagnostic methods of fetal hypoxia.
A case-control study.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin, Slovak Republic.
We divided the patients according to pH in umbilical artery (UA) < 7.15 into two groups: controls (n = 36), and studied (n = 31), retrospectively. We performed continuous simultaneous fetal monitoring with cardiotocography (CTG), fetal pulse oxymetry (IFPO), and ST segment analysis of fetal electrocardiogram (STAN).
histograms, Kolmogorov-Smirnovov test, Mann-Whitney test, Spearman's rho; statistical significance: p < 0.05, Receiver Operating Characteristic curves, Area Under the Curve.
The most frequent was intermediary CTG pattern (n = 32; 47.76%). Non-reassuring IFPO was in 22 cases (32.86%), and ST events were present in 4 cases (5.97%). CTG validity in prediction of pH in UA < 7.15: sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 50.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) 22.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 93.4%, respectively; IFPO sensitivity was 76.3%, specificity 71.4%, PPV 32.2%, and NPV was 94.4%. Validity of STAN was not significant, because of low frequency of ST events in our study. Satisfactory accuracy (AUC > 0.8) had combined continuous monitoring with CTG, IFPO and STAN. Good accuracy (AUC > 0.7) had CTG by itself, and combined monitoring with IFPO and STAN, respectively. IFPO by itself had only sufficient accuracy (AUC > 0.6).
The most valid method of fetal wellbeing objectification is combined simultaneous monitoring with CTG, IFPO and STAN. Our results support the effort in the development of integrated sensor for CTG, IFPO, and STAN.
评估胎儿缺氧生物物理诊断方法的有效性。
病例对照研究。
斯洛伐克共和国马丁市康美纽斯大学耶塞纽斯医学院妇产科。
根据脐动脉(UA)pH值<7.15将患者分为两组:对照组(n = 36)和研究组(n = 31),进行回顾性研究。我们采用胎心宫缩图(CTG)、胎儿脉搏血氧饱和度测定(IFPO)和胎儿心电图ST段分析(STAN)进行连续同步胎儿监测。
直方图、柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验、曼-惠特尼检验、斯皮尔曼等级相关系数;统计学显著性:p<0.05,受试者工作特征曲线、曲线下面积。
最常见的CTG模式为中间型(n = 32;47.76%)。22例(32.86%)出现非 reassuring 的IFPO值,4例(5.97%)出现ST事件。CTG预测UA中pH<7.15的有效性:敏感性80.0%,特异性50.0%,阳性预测值(PPV)22.1%,阴性预测值(NPV)93.4%;IFPO敏感性为76.3%,特异性为71.4%,PPV为32.2%,NPV为94.4%。由于本研究中ST事件发生率较低,STAN的有效性不显著。CTG、IFPO和STAN联合连续监测具有令人满意的准确性(AUC>0.8)。CTG单独使用以及与IFPO和STAN联合监测具有良好的准确性(AUC>0.7)。IFPO单独使用仅具有足够的准确性(AUC>0.6)。
评估胎儿健康状况最有效的方法是CTG、IFPO和STAN联合同步监测。我们的结果支持开发用于CTG、IFPO和STAN的集成传感器。