• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The impacts of different management strategies and environmental forcing in ecological communities.不同管理策略和环境胁迫对生态群落的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2491-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3611.
2
Community stability under different correlation structures of species' environmental responses.不同物种环境响应相关性结构下的群落稳定性。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Dec 7;261(3):379-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
3
Fire management strategies to maintain species population processes in a fragmented landscape of fire-interval extremes.在火灾间隔极端的破碎化景观中维持物种种群过程的火灾管理策略。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Oct;26(7):2175-2189. doi: 10.1002/eap.1362. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
4
Turing instability in pioneer/climax species interactions.先锋物种/顶极物种相互作用中的图灵不稳定性。
Math Biosci. 2005 Apr;194(2):199-216. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2004.10.010.
5
Ecological Function Analysis: Incorporating Species Roles into Conservation.生态功能分析:将物种角色纳入保护。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov;33(11):840-850. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
6
Trophically unique species are vulnerable to cascading extinction.营养独特的物种容易受到级联灭绝的影响。
Am Nat. 2008 May;171(5):568-79. doi: 10.1086/587068.
7
Keystone species and vulnerable species in ecological communities: strong or weak interactors?生态群落中的关键物种和易危物种:强相互作用者还是弱相互作用者?
J Theor Biol. 2005 Jul 7;235(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.12.022.
8
Ecological drift and competitive interactions predict unique patterns in temporal fluctuations of population size.生态漂变和竞争相互作用预测了种群大小时间波动的独特模式。
Ecology. 2019 Apr;100(4):e02623. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2623. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
9
From individuals to populations to communities: a dynamic energy budget model of marine ecosystem size-spectrum including life history diversity.从个体到种群再到群落:包含生活史多样性的海洋生态系统大小谱的动态能量预算模型。
J Theor Biol. 2013 May 7;324:52-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
10
Species abundance distribution and dynamics in two locally coupled communities.两个局部耦合群落中的物种丰度分布与动态
J Theor Biol. 2008 Aug 21;253(4):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.031. Epub 2008 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes.人口因人口统计学和环境随机性以及随机灾难而灭绝的风险。
Am Nat. 1993;142(6):911-927. doi: 10.1086/285580.
2
The effect of patch disturbance on stream invertebrate community structure: the influence of disturbance history.斑块干扰对河流无脊椎动物群落结构的影响:干扰历史的作用
Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):567-576. doi: 10.1007/BF00333735.
3
Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion.《巴别塔》,或生态稳定性讨论:术语盘点与分析及避免混淆指南
Oecologia. 1997 Feb;109(3):323-334. doi: 10.1007/s004420050090.
4
The future of biodiversity.生物多样性的未来。
Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):347-50. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5222.347.
5
Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history.不确定性、资源开发与保护:历史的教训
Science. 1993 Apr 2;260(5104):17-36. doi: 10.1126/science.260.5104.17.
6
Biology of extinction risk in marine fishes.海洋鱼类灭绝风险的生物学特性
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 22;272(1579):2337-44. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3281.
7
When will we tame the oceans?我们何时才能征服海洋?
Nature. 2005 Jul 14;436(7048):175-6. doi: 10.1038/436175a.
8
Trophic cascades in a formerly cod-dominated ecosystem.一个曾经以鳕鱼为主导的生态系统中的营养级联效应。
Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1621-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1113075.
9
Distinguishing random environmental fluctuations from ecological catastrophes for the North Pacific Ocean.区分北太平洋随机环境波动与生态灾难。
Nature. 2005 May 19;435(7040):336-40. doi: 10.1038/nature03553.
10
Interaction strength combinations and the overfishing of a marine food web.相互作用强度组合与海洋食物网的过度捕捞
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 12;102(15):5443-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501562102. Epub 2005 Mar 31.

不同管理策略和环境胁迫对生态群落的影响。

The impacts of different management strategies and environmental forcing in ecological communities.

作者信息

Enberg Katja, Fowler Mike S, Ranta Esa

机构信息

Integrative Ecology Unit, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), Helsinki, FIN-00014, Finland.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2491-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3611.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2006.3611
PMID:16959640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1634913/
Abstract

Understanding the effects of population management on the community a target species belongs to is of key importance for successful management. It is known that the removal or extinction of a single species in a community may lead to extinctions of other community members. In our study, we assess the impacts of population management on competitive communities, studying the response of both locally stable and unstable communities of varying size (between four and 10 species) to three different management strategies; harvesting of a target species, harvesting with non-targeted catch, and stocking of the target species. We also studied the consequences of selecting target species with different relative abundances, as well as the effects of varying environmental conditions. We show here how the effects of management in competitive communities extend far beyond the target population. A crucial role is played by the underlying stability properties of the community under management. In general, locally unstable communities are more vulnerable to perturbation through management. Furthermore, the community response is shown to be sensitive to the relative density of the target species. Of considerable interest is the result that even a small (2.5%) increase in the population size of the target species through stocking may lead to extinction of other community members. These results emphasize the importance of considering and understanding multi-species interactions in population management.

摘要

了解种群管理对目标物种所属群落的影响对于成功管理至关重要。众所周知,群落中单一物种的移除或灭绝可能导致其他群落成员的灭绝。在我们的研究中,我们评估了种群管理对竞争群落的影响,研究了不同规模(4至10个物种)的局部稳定和不稳定群落对三种不同管理策略的反应;目标物种的捕捞、非目标捕捞以及目标物种的放养。我们还研究了选择具有不同相对丰度的目标物种的后果,以及不同环境条件的影响。我们在此展示了竞争群落中管理的影响如何远远超出目标种群。管理下群落的潜在稳定性属性起着关键作用。一般来说,局部不稳定的群落更容易受到管理扰动的影响。此外,群落反应对目标物种的相对密度很敏感。一个相当有趣的结果是,即使通过放养使目标物种的种群数量小幅增加(2.5%)也可能导致其他群落成员灭绝。这些结果强调了在种群管理中考虑和理解多物种相互作用的重要性。