• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对战游戏中的过度自信:关于期望、攻击性、性别与睾酮的实验证据

Overconfidence in wargames: experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender and testosterone.

作者信息

Johnson Dominic D P, McDermott Rose, Barrett Emily S, Cowden Jonathan, Wrangham Richard, McIntyre Matthew H, Peter Rosen Stephen

机构信息

Society of Fellows and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, 222 Bendheim Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2513-20. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3606.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2006.3606
PMID:16959643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1634904/
Abstract

Overconfidence has long been noted by historians and political scientists as a major cause of war. However, the origins of such overconfidence, and sources of variation, remain poorly understood. Mounting empirical studies now show that mentally healthy people tend to exhibit psychological biases that encourage optimism, collectively known as 'positive illusions'. Positive illusions are thought to have been adaptive in our evolutionary past because they served to cope with adversity, harden resolve, or bluff opponents. Today, however, positive illusions may contribute to costly conflicts and wars. Testosterone has been proposed as a proximate mediator of positive illusions, given its role in promoting dominance and challenge behaviour, particularly in men. To date, no studies have attempted to link overconfidence, decisions about war, gender, and testosterone. Here we report that, in experimental wargames: (i) people are overconfident about their expectations of success; (ii) those who are more overconfident are more likely to attack; (iii) overconfidence and attacks are more pronounced among males than females; and (iv) testosterone is related to expectations of success, but not within gender, so its influence on overconfidence cannot be distinguished from any other gender specific factor. Overall, these results constitute the first empirical support of recent theoretical work linking overconfidence and war.

摘要

长期以来,历史学家和政治学家都指出过度自信是战争的一个主要原因。然而,这种过度自信的起源以及变化的根源仍未得到充分理解。越来越多的实证研究表明,心理健康的人往往会表现出鼓励乐观主义的心理偏差,统称为“积极错觉”。积极错觉被认为在我们的进化历史中具有适应性,因为它们有助于应对逆境、强化决心或唬住对手。然而如今,积极错觉可能会导致代价高昂的冲突和战争。鉴于睾酮在促进支配和挑战行为方面的作用,尤其是在男性中,它被认为是积极错觉的一个直接调节因素。迄今为止,尚无研究尝试将过度自信、战争决策、性别和睾酮联系起来。在此我们报告,在实验性军事演习中:(i)人们对自己成功的预期过度自信;(ii)那些过度自信的人更有可能发动攻击;(iii)过度自信和攻击行为在男性中比在女性中更为明显;(iv)睾酮与成功预期有关,但不存在性别差异,因此其对过度自信的影响无法与任何其他性别特异性因素区分开来。总体而言,这些结果构成了将过度自信与战争联系起来的近期理论工作的首个实证支持。

相似文献

1
Overconfidence in wargames: experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender and testosterone.对战游戏中的过度自信:关于期望、攻击性、性别与睾酮的实验证据
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2513-20. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3606.
2
Fortune favours the bold: an agent-based model reveals adaptive advantages of overconfidence in war.时势造英雄:基于主体的模型揭示了战争中过度自信的适应性优势。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020851. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
3
The evolution of overconfidence.过度自信的演变。
Nature. 2011 Sep 14;477(7364):317-20. doi: 10.1038/nature10384.
4
Overfeed the Bold, Starve the Cowardly: A Legend or Reality?撑死胆大的,饿死胆小的:是传说还是现实?
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1139-1163. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9739-6.
5
The Evolutionary Psychology of War: Offense and Defense in the Adapted Mind.战争的进化心理学:适应性思维中的进攻与防御
Evol Psychol. 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):1474704917742720. doi: 10.1177/1474704917742720.
6
The Role of Overconfidence in Romantic Desirability and Competition.过度自信在浪漫吸引力和竞争中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Aug;41(8):1036-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167215588754. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
7
Testosterone responses to competition predict future aggressive behaviour at a cost to reward in men.男性对竞争的睾酮反应预示着未来以奖励为代价的攻击性行为。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 May;34(4):561-70. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.018. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
8
Managerial overconfidence in capital structure decisions and its link to aggregate demand: An agent-based model perspective.管理层在资本结构决策中的过度自信及其与总需求的联系:基于代理的模型视角。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0255537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255537. eCollection 2021.
9
The coevolution of overconfidence and bluffing in the resource competition game.资源竞争博弈中过度自信与虚张声势的共同进化
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 17;6:21104. doi: 10.1038/srep21104.
10
Overconfidence, Incentives and Digit Ratio.过度自信、激励与指长比
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 4;6:23294. doi: 10.1038/srep23294.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral judgments in online discourse are not biased by gender.网络话语中的道德判断不存在性别偏见。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08749-x.
2
The demography of human warfare can drive sex differences in altruism.人类战争的人口统计学特征会导致利他行为中的性别差异。
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Feb 20;2:e7. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.5. eCollection 2020.
3
Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides.社会性哺乳动物的群体间冲突和集体运动中的性别偏见:雄性战士和雌性引导者。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210142. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0142. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
4
Competitive gossip: the impact of domain, resource value, resource scarcity and coalitions.竞争八卦:领域、资源价值、资源稀缺性和联盟的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200305. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0305. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
5
Gender Differences in Fear and Risk Perception During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间恐惧与风险认知中的性别差异
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 5;12:689467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689467. eCollection 2021.
6
Gender inequality and national gender gaps in overconfidence.性别不平等与过度自信的国家性别差距
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249459. eCollection 2021.
7
Political games of attack and defence.政治攻防游戏。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200135. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0135. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
No Evidence for a Relationship Between Hair Testosterone Concentrations and 2D:4D Ratio or Risk Taking.没有证据表明头发中睾酮浓度与2D:4D比例或冒险行为之间存在关联。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Mar 5;12:30. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00030. eCollection 2018.
9
The Evolutionary Psychology of War: Offense and Defense in the Adapted Mind.战争的进化心理学:适应性思维中的进攻与防御
Evol Psychol. 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):1474704917742720. doi: 10.1177/1474704917742720.
10
Overfeed the Bold, Starve the Cowardly: A Legend or Reality?撑死胆大的,饿死胆小的:是传说还是现实?
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1139-1163. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9739-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of protocols for the application of salivary steroid analysis to field conditions.唾液类固醇分析在野外条件下应用的方案制定。
Am J Hum Biol. 1989;1(3):249-255. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.1310010304.
2
The paranoid optimist: an integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases.偏执的乐观主义者:认知偏差的综合进化模型
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):47-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3.
3
Social variables predict between-subject but not day-to-day variation in the testosterone of US men.社会变量能够预测美国男性睾酮水平的个体间差异,但无法预测其每日变化。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004 Oct;29(9):1153-62. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.01.008.
4
Men in committed, romantic relationships have lower testosterone.处于忠诚浪漫关系中的男性睾酮水平较低。
Horm Behav. 2003 Aug;44(2):119-22. doi: 10.1016/s0018-506x(03)00125-9.
5
Portrait of the self-enhancer: well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless?自我提升者的画像:适应良好且受人喜欢,还是适应不良且没有朋友?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jan;84(1):165-76.
6
Pancultural self-enhancement.跨文化自我提升。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jan;84(1):60-79.
7
The future of optimism.乐观主义的未来。
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):44-55. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.44.
8
The elements of a scientific theory of self-deception.自我欺骗的科学理论要素。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 Apr;907:114-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06619.x.
9
Testosterone and dominance in men.男性体内的睾酮与支配地位
Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Jun;21(3):353-63; discussion 363-97.
10
Salivary testosterone determination in studies of child health and development.儿童健康与发育研究中的唾液睾酮测定
Horm Behav. 1999 Feb;35(1):18-27. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1998.1492.