• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过度自信的演变。

The evolution of overconfidence.

机构信息

Politics and International Relations, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, UK.

出版信息

Nature. 2011 Sep 14;477(7364):317-20. doi: 10.1038/nature10384.

DOI:10.1038/nature10384
PMID:21921915
Abstract

Confidence is an essential ingredient of success in a wide range of domains ranging from job performance and mental health to sports, business and combat. Some authors have suggested that not just confidence but overconfidence--believing you are better than you are in reality--is advantageous because it serves to increase ambition, morale, resolve, persistence or the credibility of bluffing, generating a self-fulfilling prophecy in which exaggerated confidence actually increases the probability of success. However, overconfidence also leads to faulty assessments, unrealistic expectations and hazardous decisions, so it remains a puzzle how such a false belief could evolve or remain stable in a population of competing strategies that include accurate, unbiased beliefs. Here we present an evolutionary model showing that, counterintuitively, overconfidence maximizes individual fitness and populations tend to become overconfident, as long as benefits from contested resources are sufficiently large compared with the cost of competition. In contrast, unbiased strategies are only stable under limited conditions. The fact that overconfident populations are evolutionarily stable in a wide range of environments may help to explain why overconfidence remains prevalent today, even if it contributes to hubris, market bubbles, financial collapses, policy failures, disasters and costly wars.

摘要

自信是从工作表现和心理健康到体育、商业和战斗等广泛领域成功的关键因素。一些作者认为,不仅是自信,而且是过度自信——相信自己比实际情况更好——是有利的,因为它有助于提高雄心、士气、决心、毅力或虚张声势的可信度,从而产生自我实现的预言,即夸大的自信实际上增加了成功的可能性。然而,过度自信也会导致错误的评估、不切实际的期望和危险的决策,因此,这种错误的信念如何在包括准确、无偏见的信念在内的竞争策略的人群中演变或保持稳定仍然是一个谜。在这里,我们提出了一个进化模型,表明与直觉相反,过度自信会使个人适应度最大化,并且只要竞争成本与争夺资源的收益相比足够大,群体就会变得过度自信。相比之下,只有在有限的条件下,无偏策略才是稳定的。过度自信的群体在广泛的环境中具有进化稳定性这一事实,可能有助于解释为什么过度自信在今天仍然普遍存在,即使它导致了傲慢、市场泡沫、金融危机、政策失败、灾难和代价高昂的战争。

相似文献

1
The evolution of overconfidence.过度自信的演变。
Nature. 2011 Sep 14;477(7364):317-20. doi: 10.1038/nature10384.
2
Bluffing promotes overconfidence on social networks.在社交网络上虚张声势会助长过度自信。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jun 30;4:5491. doi: 10.1038/srep05491.
3
Fortune favours the bold: an agent-based model reveals adaptive advantages of overconfidence in war.时势造英雄:基于主体的模型揭示了战争中过度自信的适应性优势。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020851. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
4
The coevolution of overconfidence and bluffing in the resource competition game.资源竞争博弈中过度自信与虚张声势的共同进化
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 17;6:21104. doi: 10.1038/srep21104.
5
Overconfidence in wargames: experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender and testosterone.对战游戏中的过度自信:关于期望、攻击性、性别与睾酮的实验证据
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2513-20. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3606.
6
Overfeed the Bold, Starve the Cowardly: A Legend or Reality?撑死胆大的,饿死胆小的:是传说还是现实?
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1139-1163. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9739-6.
7
The Role of Overconfidence in Romantic Desirability and Competition.过度自信在浪漫吸引力和竞争中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Aug;41(8):1036-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167215588754. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
8
Unbiased individuals use valuable information when making decisions: a reply to Johnson and Fowler.公正的人在做决策时会利用有价值的信息:对约翰逊和福勒的回应。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Aug;28(8):444-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
9
Costly punishment prevails in intergroup conflict.群体间冲突中存在昂贵的惩罚。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 22;278(1723):3428-36. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0252. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
10
Is overconfidence a motivated bias? Experimental evidence.过度自信是一种动机偏差吗?实验证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Oct;147(10):1445-1465. doi: 10.1037/xge0000500.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive value of positive illusions: coping with adversity and improving relationships.积极错觉的适应性价值:应对逆境与改善人际关系。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;16:1540566. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1540566. eCollection 2025.
2
Quantifying uncert-AI-nty: Testing the accuracy of LLMs' confidence judgments.量化不确定性:测试大语言模型置信度判断的准确性。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01755-4.
3
Knowledge Versus Understanding: What Drives Moral Progress?知识与理解:是什么推动了道德进步?

本文引用的文献

1
Fortune favours the bold: an agent-based model reveals adaptive advantages of overconfidence in war.时势造英雄:基于主体的模型揭示了战争中过度自信的适应性优势。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020851. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
2
The evolution of misbelief.误解的演变。
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Dec;32(6):493-510; discussion 510-61. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09990975.
3
The paranoid optimist: an integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases.偏执的乐观主义者:认知偏差的综合进化模型
Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2025;28(1):17-39. doi: 10.1007/s10677-024-10465-w. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
4
Do behavioral drivers matter for healthcare decision-making during crises? A study of low-income women in El Salvador during the COVID-19 pandemic.在危机期间,行为驱动因素对医疗保健决策是否重要?COVID-19 大流行期间对萨尔瓦多低收入妇女的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2122. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19039-y.
5
A low-dimensional approximation of optimal confidence.最优置信的低维逼近。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jul 24;20(7):e1012273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012273. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Antecedents and outcomes of cyberbullying among Chinese university students: verification of a behavioral pathway model.中国大学生网络欺凌的前因和后果:行为途径模型的验证。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 2;12:1359828. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1359828. eCollection 2024.
7
Evolution of a theory of mind.心理理论的演变。
iScience. 2024 Jan 11;27(2):108862. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108862. eCollection 2024 Feb 16.
8
Differences in metacognitive functioning between obsessive-compulsive disorder patients and highly compulsive individuals from the general population.强迫症患者与普通人群中高度强迫性个体的元认知功能差异。
Psychol Med. 2023 Dec;53(16):7933-7942. doi: 10.1017/S003329172300209X. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
9
History biases reveal novel dissociations between perceptual and metacognitive decision-making.历史偏见揭示了知觉和元认知决策之间的新分离。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):14. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.14.
10
The role of expectations, control and reward in the development of pain persistence based on a unified model.基于统一模型探讨期望、控制和奖励在疼痛持续性发展中的作用。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e81795. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81795.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):47-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3.
4
The elements of a scientific theory of self-deception.自我欺骗的科学理论要素。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 Apr;907:114-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06619.x.
5
Positive illusions and well-being revisited: separating fact from fiction.再探积极错觉与幸福感:分清虚实
Psychol Bull. 1994 Jul;116(1):21-7; discussion 28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.21.
6
Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour.评估策略与战斗行为的演变
J Theor Biol. 1974 Sep;47(1):223-43. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(74)90111-8.