Lancioni G E, Singh N N, O'Reilly M F, Oliva D, Smaldone A, Tota A, Martielli G, Stasolla F, Pontiggia G, Groeneweg J
University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006 Oct;50(Pt 10):739-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00839.x.
Stimulation and microswitch-based programmes are considered main strategies to promote indices of happiness in students with multiple disabilities. However, only limited attempts have been made to assess the relative effects of the two programmes. This study conducted such an assessment with seven students with multiple disabilities.
The first four phases of the study served to: (1) provide the students with a systematic exposure to each of the programmes; and (2) measure the programmes' effects on indices of happiness by comparing them with baseline levels. The fifth phase served to compare the programmes with each other.
The first four phases of the study showed that the microswitch-based programme produced a significant increase in indices of happiness for all seven students, and the stimulation programme produced a significant increase for six students. During the fifth phase of the study (i.e. when the two programmes were alternated), the microswitch-based programme promoted significantly higher indices of happiness than the stimulation programme for four of the seven students.
Microswitch-based programmes might be deemed preferable to stimulation programmes because they can promote higher or comparable indices of happiness while promoting the acquisition of adaptive responses and self-determination.
刺激疗法和基于微动开关的方案被认为是促进多重残疾学生幸福感指标的主要策略。然而,仅进行了有限的尝试来评估这两种方案的相对效果。本研究对七名多重残疾学生进行了这样的评估。
研究的前四个阶段用于:(1)让学生系统地接触每种方案;(2)通过与基线水平比较来测量方案对幸福感指标的影响。第五阶段用于相互比较这两种方案。
研究的前四个阶段表明,基于微动开关的方案使所有七名学生的幸福感指标显著提高,刺激疗法使六名学生的幸福感指标显著提高。在研究的第五阶段(即两种方案交替进行时),对于七名学生中的四名,基于微动开关的方案比刺激疗法促进了显著更高的幸福感指标。
基于微动开关的方案可能被认为比刺激疗法更可取,因为它们可以促进更高或相当的幸福感指标,同时促进适应性反应和自主能力的获得。