Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症中的工作记忆缺陷:n-back任务与听觉序列加法测试的比较

Working memory deficits in multiple sclerosis: comparison between the n-back task and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test.

作者信息

Parmenter Brett A, Shucard Janet L, Benedict Ralph H B, Shucard David W

机构信息

Division of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, Department of Neurology/The Jacobs Neurological Institute, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Sep;12(5):677-87. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706060826.

Abstract

Working memory (WM) deficits are common in multiple sclerosis (MS). The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) is used frequently to measure WM in clinical settings. The n-back paradigm is used often in experimental studies of WM. One unique component of the n-back task is that it provides a measure of reaction time (RT), an additional behavioral index of processing speed and task difficulty. Despite the use of both tasks to measure WM, their common variance has not been documented. We tested 32 MS patients and 20 controls; performance measures were obtained for both tasks. Compared with controls, MS patients generally had poorer performance on both the PASAT and n-back task. MS patients also had slower RTs on the n-back than controls and showed more slowing than controls as a function of WM load. Correlational analyses showed a high correspondence between performance measures on the PASAT and n-back. Principal components analysis pointed to a common feature of the PASAT, n-back, and specific other neuropsychological measures, that is, processing speed. Although the PASAT and n-back were shown to have a significant amount of shared variance, each test has specific advantages and disadvantages for use in clinical populations.

摘要

工作记忆(WM)缺陷在多发性硬化症(MS)中很常见。定速听觉连续加法测验(PASAT)在临床环境中经常用于测量工作记忆。n-back范式在工作记忆的实验研究中经常被使用。n-back任务的一个独特组成部分是它提供了反应时间(RT)的测量,这是处理速度和任务难度的一个额外行为指标。尽管这两项任务都用于测量工作记忆,但它们的共同方差尚未得到记录。我们测试了32名MS患者和20名对照;两项任务都获得了性能测量结果。与对照组相比,MS患者在PASAT和n-back任务上的表现通常较差。MS患者在n-back任务上的反应时间也比对照组慢,并且随着工作记忆负荷的增加,比对照组表现出更多的反应减慢。相关分析表明,PASAT和n-back任务的性能测量之间具有高度相关性。主成分分析指出了PASAT、n-back以及其他特定神经心理学测量的一个共同特征,即处理速度。尽管PASAT和n-back被证明有大量的共同方差,但每项测试在临床人群中的使用都有其特定的优点和缺点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验