Shucard Janet L, Parrish Joy, Shucard David W, McCabe Danielle C, Benedict Ralph H B, Ambrus Julian
Department of Neurology, Division of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, State University of New York at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 Jan;10(1):35-45. doi: 10.1017/S1355617704101057.
As many as 66% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have been reported to have cognitive deficits. These deficits are often associated with information processing speed and working memory. Similarly, processing speed and working memory impairments are the hallmark of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis (MS). The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) places high demands on processing speed and working memory. Fisk and Archibald, however, demonstrated that the total score of the PASAT does not accurately reflect impairments in these cognitive processes. They found that MS patients used a chunking strategy to obtain correct responses and reduce the cognitive demands of the task. In the present study, PASAT performance was examined for 45 SLE patients and 27 controls using alternative scoring procedures. Although the total number of correct responses did not differ between SLE and controls at the 2.4 or 2.0 s presentation rates, SLE patients had fewer dyads (correct consecutive responses) than controls at the faster rate, and more chunking responses than controls at both rates. Disease activity, disease duration, depression, fatigue, and corticosteroids could not account for these differences. The findings suggest that SLE patients, like MS patients, chunk responses more often than controls, and that this scoring procedure may better reflect the working memory and processing speed deficits present in SLE.
据报道,多达66%的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者存在认知缺陷。这些缺陷通常与信息处理速度和工作记忆有关。同样,处理速度和工作记忆受损是多发性硬化症(MS)认知功能障碍的标志。听觉序列加法测验(PASAT)对处理速度和工作记忆要求很高。然而,菲斯克和阿奇博尔德证明,PASAT的总分并不能准确反映这些认知过程中的损伤。他们发现,MS患者使用组块策略来获得正确答案并降低任务的认知需求。在本研究中,使用替代评分程序对45名SLE患者和27名对照者的PASAT表现进行了检查。尽管在2.4秒或2.0秒的呈现速度下,SLE患者和对照者的正确答案总数没有差异,但在较快的速度下,SLE患者的二元组(正确连续反应)比对照者少,并且在两种速度下,SLE患者的组块反应都比对照者多。疾病活动度、病程、抑郁、疲劳和皮质类固醇不能解释这些差异。研究结果表明,SLE患者与MS患者一样,比对照者更频繁地进行组块反应,并且这种评分程序可能更好地反映SLE中存在的工作记忆和处理速度缺陷。