Buxbaum Laurel J, Kyle Kathleen M, Tang Kathy, Detre John A
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Korman 213, 1200 W. Tabor Road, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA.
Brain Res. 2006 Oct 30;1117(1):175-85. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.010. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
A number of lines of evidence suggest that computation of hand posture differs for object grasping as compared to functional object use. Hand shaping for grasping appears to rely strongly upon calculations of current object location and volume, whereas hand shaping for object use additionally requires access to stored knowledge about the skilled manipulation specific to a given object. In addition, the particular hand postures employed for functional object use may be either prehensile (clenching, pinching) or non-prehensile (e.g., palming, poking), in contrast to the prehensile postures that are obligatory for grasping. In this fMRI study, we assessed the hypothesis that a left-hemisphere-lateralized system including the inferior parietal lobe is specifically recruited for the computation and recognition of hand postures for functional object use. Fifteen subjects viewed pictures of manipulable objects and determined whether they would be grasped with a pinch or clench (Grasp condition), functionally used with a pinch or clench (Prehensile Use condition), or functionally used with a palm or poke hand posture (Non-prehensile Use condition). Despite the fact that the conditions were equated for behavioral difficulty, significantly greater activations were observed in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG), and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) in Non-prehensile Use trials as compared to Grasp trials. Comparison of Non-prehensile Use and Prehensile Use activations revealed significant differences only in the left IPL. These data confirm the importance of the left IPL in storing knowledge of hand postures for functional object use, and have implications for understanding the interaction of dorsal and ventral visual processing systems.
多项证据表明,与功能性物体使用相比,抓握物体时手部姿势的计算方式有所不同。抓握时的手部塑形似乎强烈依赖于对当前物体位置和体积的计算,而功能性物体使用时的手部塑形还需要获取有关特定物体熟练操作的存储知识。此外,功能性物体使用时所采用的特定手部姿势可能是抓握式的(紧握、捏)或非抓握式的(例如,用手掌托、戳),这与抓握时必须采用的抓握姿势形成对比。在这项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中,我们评估了这样一个假设,即包括下顶叶在内的左半球侧化系统专门用于功能性物体使用时手部姿势的计算和识别。15名受试者观看可操作物体的图片,并确定他们是会用捏或紧握的方式抓握物体(抓握条件),用捏或紧握的方式进行功能性使用(抓握式使用条件),还是用手掌或戳的手部姿势进行功能性使用(非抓握式使用条件)。尽管这些条件在行为难度上是相等的,但与抓握试验相比,在非抓握式使用试验中,左额下回(IFG)、颞上回后部(STG)和顶下小叶(IPL)的激活明显更强。非抓握式使用和抓握式使用激活的比较仅在左顶下小叶显示出显著差异。这些数据证实了左顶下小叶在存储功能性物体使用时手部姿势知识方面的重要性,并对理解背侧和腹侧视觉处理系统的相互作用具有启示意义。