Savian Camila, Paratz Jennifer, Davies Andrew
Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Heart Lung. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.02.003.
Manual hyperinflation (MHI) and ventilator hyperinflation (VHI) are two methods of recruitment maneuvers used in ventilated patients to improve lung compliance and secretion mobilization. The use of VHI may minimize the adverse effects of disconnection from the ventilator, but it is uncertain whether high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) would decrease the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and consequently affect secretion clearance.
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of MHI and VHI in terms of clearing pulmonary secretions (sputum wet weight and PEFR), improving static respiratory system compliance and oxygenation (arterial oxygen tension/fraction of inspired oxygen), and altering mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and carbon dioxide output at different levels of PEEP.
This was a randomized crossover study involving 14 general intensive care patients who were intubated and mechanically ventilated.
Sputum production was similar in both techniques and levels of PEEP. There were no differences in improvement in oxygenation and static respiratory system compliance between MHI and VHI. However, VHI increased Cst significantly at 30 minutes posttreatment (P = .012), and a significant difference was observed between levels 5 and 7.5 cmH(2)O (P = .02) of PEEP for MHI. MHI generated higher PEFR than VHI (P < .05). No adverse change in heart rate or mean arterial pressure was observed during either technique; however, VCO(2) was significantly different for techniques (P = .045) and over time (P = .05).
The VHI technique seems to promote greater improvements in respiratory mechanics with less metabolic disturbance compared with MHI. Other variables such as sputum production, hemodynamics, and oxygenation were affected similarly by both techniques.
手法肺复张(MHI)和呼吸机肺复张(VHI)是用于机械通气患者以改善肺顺应性和促进分泌物排出的两种肺复张方法。使用VHI可能会将与呼吸机断开连接的不良影响降至最低,但高水平呼气末正压(PEEP)是否会降低呼气峰值流速(PEFR)并进而影响分泌物清除尚不确定。
本研究旨在比较MHI和VHI在清除肺分泌物(痰液湿重和PEFR)、改善静态呼吸系统顺应性和氧合(动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数)以及在不同PEEP水平下改变平均动脉压、心率和二氧化碳排出量方面的有效性。
这是一项随机交叉研究,纳入了14例接受气管插管和机械通气的综合重症监护患者。
两种技术和不同PEEP水平下的痰液生成量相似。MHI和VHI在改善氧合和静态呼吸系统顺应性方面无差异。然而,VHI在治疗后30分钟时显著增加了Cst(P = 0.012),并且在MHI的PEEP为5和7.5 cmH₂O水平之间观察到显著差异(P = 0.02)。MHI产生的PEFR高于VHI(P < 0.05)。在两种技术操作过程中均未观察到心率或平均动脉压的不良变化;然而,两种技术之间以及随着时间推移VCO₂存在显著差异(P = 0.045和P = 0.05)。
与MHI相比,VHI技术似乎能在代谢紊乱较少的情况下更有效地改善呼吸力学。两种技术对痰液生成、血流动力学和氧合等其他变量的影响相似。