Suppr超能文献

多发性骨髓瘤所致不明原因发热(FUO):萘普生试验的诊断价值

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) caused by multiple myeloma: the diagnostic value of the Naprosyn test.

作者信息

Cunha Burke A, Bouyarden Michael, Hamid Naveed S

机构信息

Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):358-62. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.10.001.

Abstract

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) remains a difficult diagnostic problem. The causes of FUO have changed over the years. Neoplastic disorders have now displaced infectious diseases as the most common cause of FUOs. Most neoplasms are associated with no or low-grade temperatures, with some important exceptions. Hypernephromas and lymphomas are neoplasms typically associated with high spiking fevers or may present as FUOs. Hematologic malignancies, that is, the acute and chronic leukemias, myeloproliferative disorders, and multiple myeloma, do not usually present with acute fevers or as FUOs. We present an elderly male patient who presented with an FUO, whose history is significant for multiple myeloma in remission. Differential diagnostic possibilities in this patient included plasma cell leukemia, relapse of multiple myeloma, secondary/superimposed malignancy, or opportunistic infection. The main differential diagnosis for his FUO was between neoplastic and infectious disorders. As part of the diagnostic workup, a Naprosyn test (naproxen 375 mg [by mouth] every 12 hours for 3 days) was used to differentiate neoplastic from infectious causes of FUO in this patient. The Naprosyn test was positive, which indicated a neoplastic explanation for the patient's FUO and eliminated, along with the infectious disease workup, an infectious explanation for his FUO. The patient's FUO was finally determined to be the result of a relapse of multiple myeloma and not of a secondary malignancy or malignant transformation of myeloma into plasma cell leukemia. We conclude the Naprosyn test remains a valuable diagnostic test to use to narrow differential diagnostic possibilities in patients with FUOs when a malignancy is a diagnostic consideration.

摘要

不明原因发热(FUO)仍然是一个难以诊断的问题。多年来,FUO的病因已经发生了变化。肿瘤性疾病现已取代传染病,成为FUO最常见的病因。大多数肿瘤与无发热或低热相关,但有一些重要的例外情况。肾细胞癌和淋巴瘤是通常与高热或可表现为FUO相关的肿瘤。血液系统恶性肿瘤,即急性和慢性白血病、骨髓增殖性疾病及多发性骨髓瘤,通常不会表现为急性发热或FUO。我们报告一名老年男性患者,他以FUO就诊,其病史中多发性骨髓瘤处于缓解期。该患者的鉴别诊断可能性包括浆细胞白血病、多发性骨髓瘤复发、继发性/叠加性恶性肿瘤或机会性感染。对其FUO的主要鉴别诊断在于肿瘤性疾病和感染性疾病之间。作为诊断检查的一部分,使用了萘普生试验(萘普生375毫克[口服],每12小时一次,共3天)来区分该患者FUO的肿瘤性病因和感染性病因。萘普生试验呈阳性,这表明该患者FUO的病因是肿瘤性的,并且与传染病检查结果一起排除了其FUO的感染性病因。该患者的FUO最终被确定为多发性骨髓瘤复发的结果,而非继发性恶性肿瘤或骨髓瘤向浆细胞白血病的恶性转化。我们得出结论,当考虑恶性肿瘤为诊断可能时,萘普生试验仍然是一种有价值的诊断试验,可用于缩小FUO患者的鉴别诊断可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验